Integral-closure conjecture for the plus and minus Hecke algebras

About 22 years old · traced to

Let pp be an odd prime, let kk be a positive integer, and let Γ=Γ0(p)\Gamma=\Gamma_0(p). Let Tnew⁡\mathbf{T}^{\operatorname{new}} act on the new subspace of cusp forms, and let wpw_p be the Fricke involution. Define

T+=Tnew⁡/(Up+p(k−2)/2),T−=Tnew⁡/(Up−p(k−2)/2),\mathbf{T}^{+}=\mathbf{T}^{\operatorname{new}}/(U_p+p^{(k-2)/2}),\qquad \mathbf{T}^{-}=\mathbf{T}^{\operatorname{new}}/(U_p-p^{(k-2)/2}),

where these algebras act on the +1+1 and −1-1 eigenspaces, respectively. Let Z‾p\overline{\mathbf{Z}}_p denote the algebraic integers in an algebraic closure of Qp\mathbf{Q}_p.

Integral-closure conjecture. If k<p−1k<p-1, then T+\mathbf{T}^{+} and T−\mathbf{T}^{-} are integrally closed. Equivalently, every congruence between distinct eigenforms in Sk(Z‾p)S_k(\overline{\mathbf{Z}}_p) occurs between eigenforms with opposite wpw_p-eigenvalues.

For k=2k=2, the paper explains that opposite-sign congruences cannot occur because pp is odd, so this recovers the assertion that pp does not divide the normalization index. The general assertion is presented as a conjecture about the source of congruences.

References

Primary source

Frank Calegari and William Stein, “Conjectures about discriminants of Hecke algebras at prime level”, arXiv:math/0406243 (2004).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.