Tate–Beilinson conjecture on cycles and numerical equivalence over finite fields

From papers

Let XX be a smooth projective variety over Fq\mathbb{F}_q and let nn be an integer. Write G^\hat G for the relevant Galois group, and let Hcont2n(Xˉ,Ql(n))H^{2n}_{cont}(\bar X,\mathbb{Q}_l(n)) denote continuous ll-adic cohomology of the base change Xˉ\bar X. The cycle map is

CHn(X)QlHcont2n(Xˉ,Ql(n))G^.CH^n(X)\otimes\mathbb{Q}_l\longrightarrow H^{2n}_{cont}(\bar X,\mathbb{Q}_l(n))^{\hat G}.

Tate–Beilinson conjecture. For every prime ll: (1) the cycle map above is surjective; (2) the G^\hat G-module Hcont2n(Xˉ,Ql(n))H^{2n}_{cont}(\bar X,\mathbb{Q}_l(n)) is semisimple at the eigenvalue 11; and (3) rational and numerical equivalence agree with rational coefficients.

The source attributes the first two parts to Tate and the third to Beilinson. These conditions are presented as the classical conjecture related to the finite-generation and integral-comparison statements, but no resolution status is supplied.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Thomas H. Geisser, “Weil-etale cohomology over finite fields”, arXiv:math/0404425 (2004).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.