O'Grady's I conjecture for birational involutions on deformations of Hilbert schemes of K3 surfaces

At least 21 years old · documented by

Let XX be an irreducible symplectic manifold deformation equivalent to (K3)[n](K3)^{[n]}, let (  )(\,\ ) be its Beauville form, and let h∈HZ1,1(X)h\in H^{1,1}_{\mathbb Z}(X) satisfy (h,h)=2(h,h)=2. For αi∈HQ1,1(X)\alpha_i\in H^{1,1}_{\mathbb Q}(X), assume that (αi,⋅)(\alpha_i,\cdot) is integration over an effective analytic 11-cycle, and let βi∈HZ1,1(X)\beta_i\in H^{1,1}_{\mathbb Z}(X) be Poincare dual to an effective divisor. Define the reflection Rh ⁣:H2(X)→H2(X)R_h\colon H^2(X)\to H^2(X) by Rh(γ)=−γ+(γ,h)hR_h(\gamma)=-\gamma+(\gamma,h)h. O'Grady's I conjecture. There exists a birational involution ϕ ⁣:X⇢X\phi\colon X\dashrightarrow X such that, for every γ∈H2(X)\gamma\in H^2(X),

H2(ϕ)(γ)=Rh(γ)−∑i(γ,αi)βi.H^2(\phi)(\gamma)=R_h(\gamma)-\sum_i(\gamma,\alpha_i)\beta_i.

This conjecture is presented as a consequence of the L conjecture in the supplied text; no proof or resolution is given there.

References

Primary source

Kieran G. O'Grady, “Involutions and linear systems on holomorphic symplectic manifolds”, arXiv:math/0403519 (2004).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.