Exchange-relation conjecture for cluster-category triangles

About 22 years old · traced to

Let HH be a finite-dimensional hereditary algebra, let T‾\overline{T} be an almost complete basic tilting object of its cluster category C⁡\operatorname{\mathcal C}, and let M,M∗M,M^{\ast} be the complements of T‾\overline{T}. Suppose there are triangles

M∗⟶B⟶M⟶M∗[1],M^{\ast}\longrightarrow B\longrightarrow M\longrightarrow M^{\ast}[1], M⟶B′⟶M∗∗⟶M[1].M\longrightarrow B'\longrightarrow M^{\ast\ast}\longrightarrow M[1].

Write B=∐i∈IBidiB=\coprod_{i\in I}B_i^{d_i} and B′=∐j∈J(Bj′)ejB'=\coprod_{j\in J}(B'_j)^{e_j}, with pairwise non-isomorphic summands. Let x,x′x,x' correspond to M,M∗M,M^{\ast}, and let xi,xj′x_i,x'_j correspond to Bi,Bj′B_i,B'_j.

Exchange-relation conjecture. The exchange relation in A⁡(H)\operatorname{\mathcal A}(H) is

xx′=∏i∈Ixidi+∏j∈J(xj′)ej.xx'=\prod_{i\in I}x_i^{d_i}+\prod_{j\in J}(x'_j)^{e_j}.

In particular, BB and B′B' should have no common direct summands.

The conjecture seeks to recover cluster exchange relations from the two complement triangles; the supplied text gives no resolution beyond supporting the proposed correspondence.

References

Primary source

Aslak Bakke Buan, Bethany Marsh, Markus Reineke, Idun Reiten and Gordana Todorov, “Tilting theory and cluster combinatorics”, arXiv:math/0402054 (2004).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.