Tridiagonal-pair and type-(1,1) quantum-affine-module correspondence

Let A,AA,A^* be a tridiagonal pair on VV satisfying the conditions of Definition 1p1 and the stated eigenvalue-form lemma. Let K,R,LK,R,L denote the operators in the associated Uq(sl^2)U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2) action, and call a finite-dimensional irreducible module type (1,1)(1,1) when K0K1K_0K_1 acts as the identity. Type-(1,1) correspondence conjecture. The space VV has an irreducible type-(1,1)(1,1) Uq(sl^2)U_q(\widehat{\mathfrak{sl}}_2)-module structure such that

A=aK+R,A=aK1+L,A=aK+R,\qquad A^*=a^*K^{-1}+L,

and none of its weights equals aa(qq1)2aa^*(q-q^{-1})^2. Conversely, if VV is a finite-dimensional irreducible type-(1,1)(1,1) module, a,aa,a^* are nonzero scalars, and none of its weights equals aa(qq1)2aa^*(q-q^{-1})^2, then the displayed formulas define a tridiagonal pair satisfying the same conditions. The conjecture proposes a classification correspondence between the specified tridiagonal pairs and quantum-affine modules; the supplied text gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Tatsuro Ito and Paul Terwilliger, “The shape of a tridiagonal pair”, arXiv:math/0304244 (2003).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.