The equivariant Bloch–Kato conjecture for motives

Let MM be a motive as in the paper's notation, let peq2p eq 2 be a \prime, and let kk be big enough. The fundamental line is

Δf(G,M(1k))=detQ[G]1HM1(Z,Q[G]M(k))detQ[G](Q[G]MB(k1))+.\Delta_f(G,M^\lor(1-k))=\operatorname{det}^{-1}_{{\Bbb{Q}}[G]} H_{\mathcal{M}}^1({\Bbb{Z}},{\Bbb{Q}}[G]\otimes M(k))\otimes \operatorname{det}_{{\Bbb{Q}}[G]} ({\Bbb{Q}}[G]\otimes M_B(k-1))^+.

Equivariant Bloch–Kato conjecture. The Beilinson regulator induces an isomorphism Δf(G,M(1k))R\1R[G]\Delta_f(G,M^\lor(1-k))\otimes {\Bbb{R}}\cong \1_{{\Bbb{R}}[G]}, under which (λLS(G,M(1k)))1(\lambda L_S(G,M^\lor(1-k))^*)^{-1} is induced by a unique generator (λ1δ(G,M,k))Δf(G,M(1k))(\lambda^{-1}\delta(G,M,k))\in\Delta_f(G,M^\lor(1-k)). The reduced norm is an isomorphism K1(Qp[G])Z(Qp[G])K_1({\Bbb{Q}}_p[G])\cong Z({\Bbb{Q}}_p[G])^*, and hence

δp(G,M,k):=(λ1δ(G,M,k))λΔf(G,M(1k))Qp.\delta_p(G,M,k):=(\lambda^{-1}\delta(G,M,k))\lambda\in \Delta_f(G,M^\lor(1-k))\otimes{\Bbb{Q}}_p.

The pp-adic regulator induces the stated determinant isomorphism, and for a Galois-stable lattice TBMBT_B\subset M_B with Tp=TBZpT_p=T_B\otimes{\Bbb{Z}}_p, δp(G,M,k)\delta_p(G,M,k) is induced by a generator δ~p(G,M,k)\widetilde{\delta}_p(G,M,k) in the corresponding integral determinant line.

This is the equivariant formulation of the Bloch–Kato conjecture, generalizing the original conjecture to non-abelian coefficients. The paper states that the resulting generators are compatible in towers and uses this conjecture as the finite-level input for the non-abelian Iwasawa Main Conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Annette Huber and Guido Kings, “Equivariant Bloch-Kato conjecture and non-abelian Iwasawa Main Conjecture”, arXiv:math/0207284 (2002).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.