Motivic variation conjecture for the Grassmannian n-logarithm

From papers

Let G^n1n\widehat G_{n-1}^n be the configuration space used to define the Grassmannian nn-logarithm, and let ai,bja_i,b_j be the maps on this space appearing in its functional equations. A framed mixed Tate motive has a Lie period given by the Lie period of its Hodge realization. Motivic variation conjecture. There exists a variation LnM\mathbb L_n^{\mathcal M} of framed mixed Tate motives over G^n1n\widehat G_{n-1}^n such that

i=02n(1)iaiLnM=0,j=02n(1)jbjLnM=0,\sum_{i=0}^{2n}(-1)^i a_i^*\mathbb L_n^{\mathcal M}=0,\qquad \sum_{j=0}^{2n}(-1)^j b_j^*\mathbb L_n^{\mathcal M}=0,

and whose Lie period LnM\mathcal L_n^{\mathcal M} satisfies

LnMLnG=i=02n1(1)iaiFn,\mathcal L_n^{\mathcal M}-\mathcal L_n^G=\sum_{i=0}^{2n-1}(-1)^i a_i^*F_n,

where FnF_n is a function on G^n2n(C)\widehat G_{n-2}^n(\mathbb C). Moreover, the functional equations for LnM\mathcal L_n^{\mathcal M} essentially determine it: the space of smooth or measurable functions satisfying them is finite dimensional. This conjecture seeks a motivic interpretation and finite-dimensionality statement for the Grassmannian nn-logarithm; the source gives no resolution.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

A. B. Goncharov, “Polylogarithms, regulators and Arakelov motivic complexes”, arXiv:math/0207036 (2004).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.