Uniqueness conjecture for canonical parallel translation

From papers

Let XKX_K be a smooth connected scheme over KK, let x0,x1X(K)x_0,x_1\in X(K), and let FxiF_{x_i} denote the corresponding fibre functors on the category under consideration. Write KstK_{st} for the period extension and Mor(Fx0Kst;Fx1Kst)Mor^{\otimes}(F_{x_0} \otimes K_{st};F_{x_1} \otimes K_{st}) for the space of tensor-compatible morphisms between the resulting fibre functors. Theorem B asserts the existence of a canonical parallel translation

Cx0;x1;XKMor(Fx0Kst;Fx1Kst)C_{x_0;x_1;X_K} \in Mor^{\otimes}(F_{x_0} \otimes K_{st};F_{x_1} \otimes K_{st})

satisfying the listed functoriality, composition, analyticity, extension, explicit logarithmic, and monodromy properties. Uniqueness conjecture. A collection

Cx0;x1;XKMor(Fx0Kst;Fx1Kst)C_{x_0;x_1;X_K} \in Mor^{\otimes}(F_{x_0} \otimes K_{st};F_{x_1} \otimes K_{st})

satisfying those properties is unique. The conjecture says that the canonical parallel translation constructed in Theorem B is characterized uniquely by its stated properties; the source gives no resolution or further evidence for this uniqueness claim.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Vadim Vologodsky, “Hodge structure on the fundamental group and its application to p-adic integration”, arXiv:math/0108109 (2001).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.