Beilinson–Lichtenbaum comparison conjecture for motivic cohomology

From papers

Let XX be a smooth variety over a field kk, and let p,qp,q be integers. Consider the canonical map from motivic cohomology in the Zariski topology to motivic cohomology in the étale topology,

HZarp(X,Z(q))Hetp(X,Z(q)).{\bf H}^{p}_{Zar}(X,{\bf Z}(q))\longrightarrow {\bf H}^{p}_{et}(X,{\bf Z}(q)).

Beilinson–Lichtenbaum comparison conjecture. This map is an isomorphism for pq+1p\le q+1.

The conjecture is described as a consequence of generalized Hilbert 90 and implies the norm residue conjecture. The supplied text does not state a resolution status for this formulation.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Vladimir Voevodsky, “On 2-torsion in motivic cohomology”, arXiv:math/0107110 (2001).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.