Beilinson–Lichtenbaum generalized Hilbert 90 conjecture for motivic cohomology

Let kk be a field and let n0n\ge 0. The motivic complex Z(n){\bf Z}(n) is evaluated on Spec(k)\operatorname{Spec}(k) in the étale topology. Beilinson–Lichtenbaum's generalized Hilbert 90 conjecture. For every field kk and every n0n\ge 0, one has

Hetn+1(Spec(k),Z(n))=0.{\bf H}^{n+1}_{et}(\operatorname{Spec}(k),{\bf Z}(n))=0.

This conjecture is a fundamental property expected of motivic complexes and is the main conjectural input behind the Beilinson–Lichtenbaum comparison results. The paper proves its 2-local version, but the statement as written is not resolved by the supplied text.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Vladimir Voevodsky, “On 2-torsion in motivic cohomology”, arXiv:math/0107110 (2001).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.