Stanley's reformulation of Kontsevich's polynomial-counting conjecture

About 26 years old · traced to

Let GG be a finite graph with edge set E(G)E(G), and let

QG=∑T∏e∈Txe,Q_G=\sum_T\prod_{e\in T}x_e,

where the sum runs over spanning trees TT of GG. Let V(QG)V(Q_G) be the zero scheme of QGQ_G in AE(G)\mathbf A^{E(G)}, let XG=AE(G)∖V(QG)X_G=\mathbf A^{E(G)}\setminus V(Q_G), and write [XG](q)=#XG(Fq)[X_G](q)=\#X_G(\mathbf F_q). Stanley's reformulation. For all graphs GG, [XG][X_G] is a polynomial in qq. Stanley showed that this conjecture is equivalent to Kontsevich's conjecture for YGY_G. The paper's main theorem disproves the equivalent Kontsevich conjecture, so this reformulation is refuted as well.

References

Primary source

Prakash Belkale and Patrick Brosnan, “Matroids, motives and conjecture of Kontsevich”, arXiv:math/0012198 (2000).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.