Questions on negative indices of rigidity in the Deligne–Simpson problem

Let (p+1)(p+1)-tuples of matrices MjM_j or AjA_j have a specified index of rigidity, and let the expected dimension refer to the dimension predicted for the variety of all such (p+1)(p+1)-tuples. A tuple has a non-trivial centralizer when its common centralizer is larger than the scalar matrices. Let J1n,,Jp+1nJ^n_1,\ldots,J^n_{p+1} be Jordan normal forms, and suppose they satisfy the conditions of Theorem~.

Questions on negative indices of rigidity. 1) Is the dimension of the variety of (p+1)(p+1)-tuples with non-trivial centralizers always smaller than the expected dimension of the variety of all (p+1)(p+1)-tuples of matrices MjM_j or AjA_j? 2) If the index of rigidity is negative and the Jordan normal forms J1n,,Jp+1nJ^n_1,\ldots,J^n_{p+1} satisfy the conditions of Theorem~, is the Deligne–Simpson problem weakly solvable for any eigenvalues?

These questions arise from the dimension count for varieties of tuples with non-trivial centralizers and from the preceding example with zero index of rigidity. The source does not provide a resolution of either question.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Vladimir Petrov Kostov, “Some examples related to the Deligne-Simpson problem”, arXiv:math/0011015 (2000).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.