The Kakeya conjecture in maximal-function form

Fix n2n\geq 2 and 0<δ10<\delta\ll 1. Let Ω\Omega be a maximal δ\delta-separated subset of directions on Sn1S^{n-1}, and for each ωΩ\omega\in\Omega let TωT_\omega be a δ×1\delta\times 1 tube in direction ω\omega inside the ball. Given 0<λ10<\lambda\leq 1, let T~ωTω\widetilde T_\omega\subseteq T_\omega satisfy T~ω=λTω|\widetilde T_\omega|=\lambda|T_\omega|. Write XYX\lessapprox Y for XCεδεYX\leq C_\varepsilon\delta^{-\varepsilon}Y for every ε>0\varepsilon>0. Let KX(p,n)K_X(p,n) denote the assertion that

ωΩT~ωλpδnp\left|\bigcup_{\omega\in\Omega}\widetilde T_\omega\right|\gtrapprox\lambda^p\delta^{n-p}

for all such choices. Kakeya conjecture, maximal version. We have KX(p,n)K_X(p,n). The estimate KX(1,n)K_X(1,n) is trivial, and the conjectural difficulty is to make pp large enough to prevent excessive overlap of the selected tube subsets. The maximal version is stronger than the Hausdorff and Minkowski versions because it also addresses small λ\lambda; in three and higher dimensions the conjectures remain open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Nets Katz and Terence Tao, “Recent progress on the Kakeya conjecture”, arXiv:math/0010069 (2000).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.