The modularity conjecture for rigid Calabi–Yau threefolds over Q

Let XX be a rigid Calabi–Yau threefold defined over Q{\mathbb Q} with a suitable integral model. Its LL-series is the LL-series of the Galois representation on Het3(Xˉ,Q)H^3_{\operatorname{et}}(\bar{X},{\mathbb Q}_{\ell}). Let S4(Γ0(N))S_4(\Gamma_0(N)) denote the space of cusp forms of weight 44 for Γ0(N)\Gamma_0(N).

The modularity conjecture. Any rigid Calabi–Yau threefold XX defined over Q{\mathbb Q} is modular: its LL-series coincides, up to finitely many Euler factors, with the LL-series of a cusp form ff of weight 44 on Γ0(N)\Gamma_0(N), where NN is a positive integer divisible by the primes of bad reduction. More precisely,

L(X,s)=L(f,s),fS4(Γ0(N)).L(X,s)=L(f,s),\qquad f\in S_4(\Gamma_0(N)).

This is intended as a dimension-three analogue of the Taniyama–Shimura–Weil modularity conjecture for elliptic curves. The elliptic-curve conjecture has been proved, whereas the asserted modularity of rigid Calabi–Yau threefolds is the subject of the paper and is not established in general.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Masa-Hiko Saito and Noriko Yui, “The modularity conjecture for rigid Calabi-Yau threefolds over Q”, arXiv:math/0009041 (2000).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.