Quantum–classical convergence of energy–velocity measures

Let P:=TT{\cal P}:=T^*{\bf T} be the classical phase space, with Hamiltonian H(p,q):=12p2+V(q)H(p,q):=\frac{1}{2}p^2+V(q) and Liouville measure λ\lambda. Let vˉ:PRd\bar v:{\cal P}\to{\bf R}^d be the asymptotic velocity and define the classical energy–velocity map

A:=(H,vˉ):PRd+1.A:=(H,\bar v):{\cal P}\to{\bf R}^{d+1}.

Let ν:=λA1\nu:=\lambda A^{-1}. For the quantum band energies En(k)E_n^\hbar(k) and quantum asymptotic velocities vˉn(k)\bar v_n^\hbar(k), define

A(n,k):=(En(k),vˉn(k)),A^\hbar(n,k):=(E_n^\hbar(k),\bar v_n^\hbar(k)),

where P:=N×T{\cal P}^\hbar:={\bf N}\times{\bf T}^* carries the semiclassical measure λ:=(2π)dμ1×μ2\lambda^\hbar:=(2\pi\hbar)^d\mu_1\times\mu_2, and let ν:=λ(A)1\nu^\hbar:=\lambda^\hbar(A^\hbar)^{-1}. Quantum–classical measure convergence conjecture. For all L{\cal L}-periodic potentials VC(Rd,R)V\in C^\infty({\bf R}^d,{\bf R}),

w ⁣ ⁣lim0ν=ν.w^*\!-\!\lim_{\hbar\searrow0}\nu^\hbar=\nu.

Equivalently, for every fC00(Rd+1,R)f\in C^0_0({\bf R}^{d+1},{\bf R}),

lim0Rd+1f(x)dν(x)=Rd+1f(x)dν(x).\lim_{\hbar\searrow0}\int_{{\bf R}^{d+1}}f(x)\,d\nu^\hbar(x)=\int_{{\bf R}^{d+1}}f(x)\,d\nu(x).

The source states that this was proved for smooth potentials producing integrable or ergodic motion, with related results cited for Coulombic periodic potentials; the assertion for all smooth periodic potentials is therefore the remaining general case.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Joachim Asch and Andreas Knauf, “Quantum Transport on KAM Tori”, arXiv:math-ph/9812006 (1998).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.