Error-resistant protocols for generalized Ulam's game

Let X1,,XkX_1,\ldots,X_k and YY be sets, let f ⁣:X1××XkYf\colon X_1\times\cdots\times X_k\to Y be a function, and let G<f,q,l>{\cal G}\left<f,q,l\right> denote the generalized Ulam game in which Paul asks at most qq coordinate-membership questions and Carole may lie at most ll times. A winning strategy for Paul identifies the unique possible value of ff. Generalized Ulam game conjecture. There exists a constant εg>0\varepsilon_g>0 such that, for every function ff for which Paul has a winning strategy in G<f,n,0>{\cal G}\left<f,n,0\right>, if l<εgql<\varepsilon_gq, then Paul has a winning strategy in G<f,q,l>{\cal G}\left<f,q,l\right>. Moreover, qCgnq\leq C_g n, where CgC_g is a constant depending only on l/ql/q. The conjecture extends the known linear-question behavior of standard Ulam's game with a bounded fraction of lies to the generalized setting; its resolution would provide error-resistant protocols for arbitrary functions admitting a lie-free strategy.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Marcin Peczarski, “Strategy in Ulam's Game and Tree Code Give Error-Resistant Protocols”, arXiv:cs/0410043 (2004).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.