Constant expected search complexity for CCL-coded fast forward permutations

From papers

Let (a0,a1,,al)(a_0,a_1,\dots,a_l) be a sequence generated by the CCL procedure, and let π\pi be the fast forward permutation coded by this sequence. Choose x{0,,N1}x\in\{0,\dots,N-1\} uniformly. The naive algorithm compares xx successively with s0,s1,s_0,s_1,\dots until it finds the first ii such that x<six<s_i. Constant-complexity conjecture. The expected value of this index ii is 22. Consequently, the complexity of computing πm(x)\pi^m(x) is O(1)O(1). This claim concerns the average-case performance of the naive search algorithm for the cycle data produced by the CCL procedure, in contrast with the preceding worst-case logarithmic bounds.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Boaz Tsaban, “Permutation graphs, fast forward permutations, and sampling the cycle structure of a permutation”, arXiv:cs/0207027 (2010).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.