Beraha-number vanishing-amplitude conjecture for triangular-lattice strips

Let LL be the width of a triangular-lattice strip with free, cylindrical or “zig-zag” boundary conditions. Let B2,,BL+1B_2,\ldots,B_{L+1} be the corresponding Beraha numbers, let αi(q)\alpha_i(q) denote transfer-matrix amplitudes, and let D(q)D(q) be the matrix whose determinant vanishes when at least one such amplitude vanishes. Beraha-number vanishing-amplitude conjecture. For a triangular-lattice strip of width LL with free, cylindrical or “zig-zag” boundary conditions, at each Beraha number q=B2,,BL+1q=B_2,\ldots,B_{L+1} there is at least one vanishing amplitude αi(q)\alpha_i(q). That is, detD(q)=0\det D(q)=0 for q=B2,,BL+1q=B_2,\ldots,B_{L+1}. The claim is motivated by empirical observations for all studied widths and extends an analogous conjecture for the square lattice; it is stated for arbitrary LL and remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jesper Lykke Jacobsen, Jesús Salas and Alan D. Sokal, “Transfer Matrices and Partition-Function Zeros for Antiferromagnetic Potts Models III. Triangular-Lattice Chromatic Polynomial”, arXiv:cond-mat/0204587 (2003).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.