The modular identity predicted by mirror symmetry for Schoen's Calabi–Yau threefold

From papers

Let U=exp(2πit)U=\exp(2\pi i t) and let γ=(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)\gamma=(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,-1). Let Ares(t)A^{res}(t) be the restricted A-model factor, let B(t)=n0bnUnB(t)=\sum_{n\geq0}b_nU^n be the B-model factor, and let ΘE8(3t,tγ)\Theta_{E_8}(3t,t\gamma) be the corresponding E8E_8 theta function.

Modular mirror-symmetry identity.

Ares(t)B(t),A^{res}(t)\equiv B(t),

equivalently,

n0bnUn=ΘE8(3t,tγ)n1(1U3n)12.\sum_{n\geq0}b_nU^n=\Theta_{E_8}(3t,t\gamma)\prod_{n\geq1}(1-U^{3n})^{-12}.

This identity is extracted from the first-order asymptotic expansions of the two prepotentials and is presented as a consequence predicted by the mirror conjecture. The paper does not independently prove the mirror conjecture or this identity.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Shinobu Hosono, Masa-Hiko Saito and Jan Stienstra, “On Mirror Symmetry Conjecture for Schoen's Calabi-Yau 3 folds”, arXiv:alg-geom/9709027 (1997).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.