Projective categoricity conjecture for the ball

From papers

Let KRnK\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n be a compact convex body, with n2n\ge2. Let Bn\overline{B}{}^{\,n} denote the closed unit ball, and write KLBBnK\equiv_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{B}}}\overline{B}{}^{\,n} for elementary equivalence in the projective betweenness language. A quadric is a set whose boundary is a quadric hypersurface; projective equivalence means that a projective transformation maps one body onto the other.

Ball categoricity conjecture. KLBBnK\equiv_{\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{B}}}\overline{B}{}^{\,n} if and only if K\partial K is a quadric, equivalently, if and only if KK is projectively equivalent to Bn\overline{B}{}^{\,n}.

The conjecture gives a proposed geometric characterization of the elementary theory of the ball. The paper proves that the ball and certain quartic bodies are not elementarily equivalent, but the full characterization remains open.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

David Victor Feldman, “Elementary equivalence of convex bodies in affine and projective languages”, arXiv:2607.25064 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.