Catalan classification conjecture for extremal even-intersecting lattice-path families

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let a lattice path from (0,0)(0,0) to (n,n)(n,n) be a word in {E,N}2n\{E,N\}^{2n}, and say that two paths are even-intersecting if they have an even number of common edges. Let CnC_n denote the nnth Catalan number.

Catalan classification conjecture. There are exactly CnC_n families of size 2n2^n in which every two distinct paths have an even number of common edges.

The even-intersection theorem shows that 2n2^n is the maximum possible size, while the paper constructs at least CnC_n distinct extremal families, one for each noncrossing perfect matching of [2n][2n]. The conjecture asserts that these constructions exhaust all extremal families.

References

Primary source

Umesh Shankar, “Oddtown and eventown theorems for lattice paths”, arXiv:2607.23117 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A reader-submitted proof claims the classification is complete, but that claim has not been independently verified and the published record only confirms the bound, constructions, and small cases.

The conjecture asserts that exactly CnC_n maximum-size families of pairwise even-intersecting paths exist. The July 2026 paper proves the maximum size 2n2^n, constructs CnC_n examples from noncrossing matchings, and reports verification through n≤5n\leq 5.

Known results

  • Every such family has size at most 2n2^n.
  • Noncrossing perfect matchings of [2n][2n] yield CnC_n distinct extremal families.
  • The classification is verified computationally for n≤5n\leq 5.

Community submission (unverified), September 27, 2026

A submitted proof argues that equality in Shankar's quadratic lemma forces a unique Dyck-prefix structure. It proposes a parity-kernel recurrence, classifies the equality cases, and claims that rigidity eliminates an alternating exceptional case, leaving exactly the Catalan constructions. The argument is substantive but has not been checked.

Current status (as of September 2026): the extremal bound, the CnC_n constructions, and cases n≤5n\leq 5 are settled; a submitted general classification proof exists but remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofI prove the Catalan classification conjecture. Every extremal even-intersecting family of North-East lattice paths from (0,0) to (n,n) with size 2^n is determined by a unique noncrossing perfect matching of [2n]. The proof classifies equality in Shankar's quadratic lemma by Dyck prefixes, then uses cross-rigidity and Boolean-cube rigidity.See full solutionHide full solution

Let Bm(x,y)∈F2B_m(x,y)\in\mathbb F_2 denote the parity of the number of common edges of the two mm-step paths encoded by x,y∈{0,1}mx,y\in\{0,1\}^m. The basic recurrence is

Bm(pα,qβ)=Bm−1(p,q)+1α=β1wt(p)=wt(q).B_m(p\alpha,q\beta) = B_{m-1}(p,q) + \mathbf 1_{\alpha=\beta}\mathbf 1_{\mathrm{wt}(p)=\mathrm{wt}(q)}.

The proof proceeds by determining the equality cases in the quadratic inequality underlying Shankar's Lemma 2.3.

For a Dyck prefix PP, let E(P)\mathcal E(P) be its noncrossing partial matching. If u1<⋯<uru_1<\cdots<u_r are the unmatched positions, define Aε(P)\mathcal A_\varepsilon(P) to be the set of binary words whose bits are opposite on every edge of E(P)\mathcal E(P), with the unmatched bits prescribed by ε∈{0,1}r\varepsilon\in\{0,1\}^r.

Deleting all matched coordinates preserves the parity kernel:

Bm(x,y)=Br(xˉ,yˉ).B_m(x,y)=B_r(\bar x,\bar y).

The main structural result is the following equality classification. Under the hypotheses of Shankar's quadratic lemma,

∑i∣Ai∣2=2m\sum_i |A_i|^2=2^m

holds if and only if, up to reordering,

{Ai}={Aε(P):ε∈{0,1}r}\{A_i\} = \{\mathcal A_\varepsilon(P):\varepsilon\in\{0,1\}^r\}

for a unique Dyck prefix PP.

Two rigidity statements enter the proof.

First, if two Dyck-prefix partitions are cross-compatible for BmB_m, then their noncrossing partial matchings coincide, and hence the Dyck prefixes are equal.

Second, the local reconstruction problem reduces to classifying adjacent-weight pairs u,vu,v for which

Δu,v(z)=B(u,z)+B(v,z)\Delta_{u,v}(z) = B(u,z)+B(v,z)

vanishes outside the two adjacent Hamming layers. Apart from the canonical pairs

u=t1,v=t0,u=t1,\qquad v=t0,

there is one alternating exceptional pair in odd dimension. A finite-state induction gives the complete classification. The exceptional pair is incompatible with the global cross-constancy conditions, so the reconstruction has only the two Dyck extensions PUPU and PDPD.

For the original lattice-path problem, Shankar's left/right decomposition identifies a path FF with an equal-weight pair

(u(F),v(F))∈{0,1}n×{0,1}n.(u(F),v(F)) \in \{0,1\}^n\times\{0,1\}^n.

Thus an extremal family of size 2n2^n gives an admissible relation RR of size 2n2^n. Equality throughout the componentwise Cauchy-Schwarz argument forces both sides of RR to be Dyck-prefix equality partitions.

The components therefore induce a bijection

ϕ:{0,1}r→{0,1}r\phi:\{0,1\}^r\to\{0,1\}^r

that preserves Hamming weight and the parity kernel:

Br(ϕ(x),ϕ(y))=Br(x,y).B_r(\phi(x),\phi(y))=B_r(x,y).

A rigidity argument on the Boolean cube shows that every such bijection is the identity. Consequently,

R=⋃ε∈{0,1}rAε(P)×Aε(Q).R= \bigcup_{\varepsilon\in\{0,1\}^r} \mathcal A_\varepsilon(P) \times \mathcal A_\varepsilon(Q).

Reflect the matching of QQ into the second half of the path and join corresponding unmatched positions. This produces a noncrossing perfect matching MM of [2n][2n]. The original extremal family is exactly

FM.\mathcal F_M.

The matching is unique. Indeed,

{i,j}∈M\{i,j\}\in M

if and only if every word in FM\mathcal F_M has opposite bits in positions ii and jj. If i,ji,j belong to different matching edges, those edges can be oriented independently so that the two bits agree.

Therefore every extremal even-intersecting family arises from a unique noncrossing perfect matching of [2n][2n]. Since such matchings are counted by the Catalan number,

Cn=1n+1(2nn),C_n=\frac{1}{n+1}\binom{2n}{n},

there are exactly CnC_n extremal families.

The complete proof, including the equality classification, localized-pair finite-state argument, cross-rigidity lemma, reconstruction theorem, and Boolean-cube rigidity argument, is contained in the attached manuscript.

The LaTeX source and finite verification code are available at:

https://github.com/FDmd233/catalan-lattice-path-classification

The finite computations are auxiliary checks and are not used in place of the theoretical proof.

AI assistance disclosure: OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol was used during the investigation, proof checking, drafting, and preparation of the manuscript.

  • paper_en.pdf328,331 bytesOpen