Near-isometric duality conjecture for Hardy norms of matrices

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let AA be an n×nn\times n real matrix with n>2n>2. For matrices AA and BB, define

⟨A,B⟩=Ex⟨Ax,Bx⟩=1ntr⁡(ATB),\langle A,B\rangle=\mathbb{E}_x\langle Ax,Bx\rangle=\frac{1}{n}\operatorname{tr}(A^{\mathsf T}B),

where xx is uniformly distributed on Sn−1S^{n-1}, and define the dual Hardy norm by

∥A∥H∗1=sup⁡{⟨A,B⟩:∥B∥H1≤1}.\|A\|_{H^1_*}=\sup\{\langle A,B\rangle:\|B\|_{H^1}\leq 1\}.

Let P2P_2 be a rank-two projection, and set

cn=⟨P2,P2⟩∥P2∥H1∥P2∥H4.c_n=\frac{\langle P_2,P_2\rangle}{\|P_2\|_{H^1}\|P_2\|_{H^4}}.

Near-isometric duality conjecture. For every n×nn\times n matrix AA with n>2n>2,

cn∥A∥H4≤∥A∥H∗1≤∥A∥H4.c_n\|A\|_{H^4}\leq\|A\|_{H^1_*}\leq\|A\|_{H^4}.

This conjectures that the near-isometric duality between the H1H^1 and H4H^4 Hardy norms observed for 2×22\times2 matrices persists in higher dimensions, with the sharp multiplicative loss occurring in the lower bound and determined by a rank-two projection. The parser provides no evidence that the conjecture has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Leonid V. Kovalev, “Hardy-type norms of matrices”, arXiv:2607.17373 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A posted, unverified calculation claims to disprove the proposed sharp lower bound in seven dimensions, while the separate upper bound remains open.

Kovalev’s 2026 paper formulates the near-isometric duality conjecture for matrices in dimensions n>2n>2, with the lower constant determined by a rank-two projection. It records numerical evidence but no proof of the conjecture.

Known results

  • In dimension 22, Brevig, Ortega-Cerdà, and Seip proved ∥A∥H4≤∥A∥H∗1≤C2∥A∥H4\|A\|_{H^4}\leq\|A\|_{H^1_*}\leq C_2\|A\|_{H^4}, with optimal C2=π264C_2=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt[4]{6}}.
  • For n>2n>2, Kovalev reports numerical evidence but states that even ∥A∥H∗1≤∥A∥H4\|A\|_{H^1_*}\leq\|A\|_{H^4} remains open.

August 2026 posted attempt

An unverified calculation claims that a positive-definite 7×77\times7 example has ∥A∥H∗1/∥A∥H4<c7\|A\|_{H^1_*}/\|A\|_{H^4}<c_7, disproving the conjectured lower constant and yielding an open family of alleged counterexamples. It explicitly leaves the separate upper inequality open.

Current status (as of August 2026): The two-dimensional analogue is established; a dimension-seven counterexample to the proposed lower constant is claimed but unverified, and the higher-dimensional upper bound remains open.

Sources

Solutions 1

CounterexampleThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Counterexample to the conjectured sharp lower bound. The separate upper bound remains open.

Use the conventions of Conjecture 6.1 in Leonid V. Kovalev, Hardy-type norms of matrices, arXiv:2607.17373. In dimension n=7n=7, write

Φ(C)=EX∼Unif⁡(S6)∣CX∣,⟨A,C⟩=17tr⁡(ATC).\Phi(C)=\mathbb E_{X\sim\operatorname{Unif}(S^6)}|CX|, \qquad \langle A,C\rangle=\frac17\operatorname{tr}(A^{\mathsf T}C).

1. A positive definite matrix and its exact dual norm

Set

B=diag⁡(15,1,1,1,1,1,1),A=∇FΦ(B)=diag⁡(a,b,b,b,b,b,b),\begin{aligned} B&=\operatorname{diag}(15,1,1,1,1,1,1),\\ A&=\nabla_F\Phi(B)=\operatorname{diag}(a,b,b,b,b,b,b), \end{aligned}

where ∇F\nabla_F denotes the ordinary, unnormalized Frobenius gradient. Convexity and positive homogeneity imply

tr⁡(ATC)≤Φ(C)for every C∈R7×7,\operatorname{tr}(A^{\mathsf T}C)\leq\Phi(C) \qquad\text{for every }C\in\mathbb R^{7\times7},

with equality at C=BC=B. Consequently, the source-normalized dual norm is

∥A∥H∗1=17.\boxed{\|A\|_{H^1_*}=\frac17.}

2. Exact evaluation of the gradient

Let

Y=14log⁡ ⁣(15+414).Y=\sqrt{14}\log\!\left(15+4\sqrt{14}\right).

Direct evaluation of the spherical gradient gives

a=4581528751438646272−9092272580564191232Y,b=−554403752877292544+905195225161128382464Y.\begin{aligned} a&=\frac{458152875}{1438646272} -\frac{90922725}{80564191232}Y,\\[2mm] b&=-\frac{55440375}{2877292544} +\frac{905195225}{161128382464}Y. \end{aligned}

These identities require no numerical quadrature. Since X12X_1^2 has the Beta⁡(1/2,3)\operatorname{Beta}(1/2,3) distribution, define

Jj=∫01u2j1+224u2 du.J_j=\int_0^1\frac{u^{2j}}{\sqrt{1+224u^2}}\,du.

Elementary integration yields

J0=Y56,Jj=15−(2j−1)Jj−1448j(j≥1),a=2258(J1−2J2+J3),b=516(J0−3J1+3J2−J3).\begin{aligned} J_0&=\frac{Y}{56},\\ J_j&=\frac{15-(2j-1)J_{j-1}}{448j} \qquad(j\geq1),\\ a&=\frac{225}{8}(J_1-2J_2+J_3),\\ b&=\frac5{16}(J_0-3J_1+3J_2-J_3). \end{aligned}

3. Strict failure of the conjectured lower constant

The spherical fourth-moment formula gives

∥A∥H44=R63,R=(a2+6b2)2+2(a4+6b4).\|A\|_{H^4}^{4}=\frac{R}{63}, \qquad R=(a^2+6b^2)^2+2(a^4+6b^4).

The conjectured rank-two-projection constant in dimension seven is

c7=32 141/4335π.c_7=\frac{32\,14^{1/4}\sqrt3}{35\pi}.

Therefore the proposed inequality c7∥A∥H4≤∥A∥H∗1c_7\|A\|_{H^4}\leq\|A\|_{H^1_*} is equivalent to

R≤625π42097152.R\leq\frac{625\pi^4}{2097152}.

In fact, exact rational interval arithmetic certifies

R>0.0290375624309815956692515439,625π42097152<0.0290301713448770157207370796,R−625π42097152>71000000>0.\begin{aligned} R&>0.0290375624309815956692515439,\\ \frac{625\pi^4}{2097152} &<0.0290301713448770157207370796,\\ R-\frac{625\pi^4}{2097152} &>\frac7{1000000}>0. \end{aligned}

The certification uses integer-square-root bounds for 14\sqrt{14}, the positive-remainder expansion

log⁡z=2∑j=0N−1u2j+12j+1+εN,u=z−1z+1,0<εN<2u2N+1(2N+1)(1−u2),\log z =2\sum_{j=0}^{N-1}\frac{u^{2j+1}}{2j+1}+\varepsilon_N, \qquad u=\frac{z-1}{z+1}, \qquad 0<\varepsilon_N<\frac{2u^{2N+1}}{(2N+1)(1-u^2)},

and Machin's identity

π=16arctan⁡ ⁣(15)−4arctan⁡ ⁣(1239).\pi=16\arctan\!\left(\frac15\right) -4\arctan\!\left(\frac1{239}\right).

Equivalently,

∥A∥H∗1∥A∥H4=0.974983033437249971…<0.975045085220861666…=c7.\frac{\|A\|_{H^1_*}}{\|A\|_{H^4}} =0.974983033437249971\ldots <0.975045085220861666\ldots =c_7.

Both aa and bb are positive, so AA is positive definite. Continuity gives a full-dimensional open family of counterexamples. Only the proposed lower constant is disproved; the separate upper inequality remains open.