Near-isometric duality conjecture for Hardy norms of matrices

From papers

Let AA be an n×nn\times n real matrix with n>2n>2. For matrices AA and BB, define

A,B=ExAx,Bx=1ntr(ATB),\langle A,B\rangle=\mathbb{E}_x\langle Ax,Bx\rangle=\frac{1}{n}\operatorname{tr}(A^{\mathsf T}B),

where xx is uniformly distributed on Sn1S^{n-1}, and define the dual Hardy norm by

AH1=sup{A,B:BH11}.\|A\|_{H^1_*}=\sup\{\langle A,B\rangle:\|B\|_{H^1}\leq 1\}.

Let P2P_2 be a rank-two projection, and set

cn=P2,P2P2H1P2H4.c_n=\frac{\langle P_2,P_2\rangle}{\|P_2\|_{H^1}\|P_2\|_{H^4}}.

Near-isometric duality conjecture. For every n×nn\times n matrix AA with n>2n>2,

cnAH4AH1AH4.c_n\|A\|_{H^4}\leq\|A\|_{H^1_*}\leq\|A\|_{H^4}.

This conjectures that the near-isometric duality between the H1H^1 and H4H^4 Hardy norms observed for 2×22\times2 matrices persists in higher dimensions, with the sharp multiplicative loss occurring in the lower bound and determined by a rank-two projection. The parser provides no evidence that the conjecture has been resolved.

Progress summary

Open

The higher-dimensional conjecture remains open: only the two-dimensional analogue is established, and no verified proof or counterexample has appeared.

The conjecture asserts near-isometric duality between the H1H^1 and H4H^4 norms for real n×nn\times n matrices when n>2n>2, with lower-bound constant cnc_n determined by a rank-two projection. No proposer or date is identified in the retrieved sources.

Known results

  • Brevig, Ortega-Cerdà, and Seip established the analogous two-dimensional estimate, with best constant C2=π264=1.0036C_2=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt[4]{6}}=1.0036\ldots.
  • Higher-dimensional numerical experiments support the conjecture, but the source explicitly records that even the upper bound AH1AH4\|A\|_{H^1_*}\leq\|A\|_{H^4} remains open for n>2n>2.

Current status (as of August 2026): The n=2n=2 analogue is known, while for n>2n>2 neither the conjectured upper bound nor the full two-sided inequality has a verified proof or counterexample.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Leonid V. Kovalev, “Hardy-type norms of matrices”, arXiv:2607.17373 (2026).

Solutions 1

Counterexample

Counterexample to the conjectured sharp lower bound. The separate upper bound remains open.

Use the conventions of Conjecture 6.1 in Leonid V. Kovalev, Hardy-type norms of matrices, arXiv:2607.17373. In dimension n=7n=7, write

Φ(C)=EXUnif(S6)CX,A,C=17tr(ATC).\Phi(C)=\mathbb E_{X\sim\operatorname{Unif}(S^6)}|CX|, \qquad \langle A,C\rangle=\frac17\operatorname{tr}(A^{\mathsf T}C).

1. A positive definite matrix and its exact dual norm

Set

B=diag(15,1,1,1,1,1,1),A=FΦ(B)=diag(a,b,b,b,b,b,b),\begin{aligned} B&=\operatorname{diag}(15,1,1,1,1,1,1),\\ A&=\nabla_F\Phi(B)=\operatorname{diag}(a,b,b,b,b,b,b), \end{aligned}

where F\nabla_F denotes the ordinary, unnormalized Frobenius gradient. Convexity and positive homogeneity imply

tr(ATC)Φ(C)for every CR7×7,\operatorname{tr}(A^{\mathsf T}C)\leq\Phi(C) \qquad\text{for every }C\in\mathbb R^{7\times7},

with equality at C=BC=B. Consequently, the source-normalized dual norm is

AH1=17.\boxed{\|A\|_{H^1_*}=\frac17.}

2. Exact evaluation of the gradient

Let

Y=14log ⁣(15+414).Y=\sqrt{14}\log\!\left(15+4\sqrt{14}\right).

Direct evaluation of the spherical gradient gives

a=45815287514386462729092272580564191232Y,b=554403752877292544+905195225161128382464Y.\begin{aligned} a&=\frac{458152875}{1438646272} -\frac{90922725}{80564191232}Y,\\[2mm] b&=-\frac{55440375}{2877292544} +\frac{905195225}{161128382464}Y. \end{aligned}

These identities require no numerical quadrature. Since X12X_1^2 has the Beta(1/2,3)\operatorname{Beta}(1/2,3) distribution, define

Jj=01u2j1+224u2du.J_j=\int_0^1\frac{u^{2j}}{\sqrt{1+224u^2}}\,du.

Elementary integration yields

J0=Y56,Jj=15(2j1)Jj1448j(j1),a=2258(J12J2+J3),b=516(J03J1+3J2J3).\begin{aligned} J_0&=\frac{Y}{56},\\ J_j&=\frac{15-(2j-1)J_{j-1}}{448j} \qquad(j\geq1),\\ a&=\frac{225}{8}(J_1-2J_2+J_3),\\ b&=\frac5{16}(J_0-3J_1+3J_2-J_3). \end{aligned}

3. Strict failure of the conjectured lower constant

The spherical fourth-moment formula gives

AH44=R63,R=(a2+6b2)2+2(a4+6b4).\|A\|_{H^4}^{4}=\frac{R}{63}, \qquad R=(a^2+6b^2)^2+2(a^4+6b^4).

The conjectured rank-two-projection constant in dimension seven is

c7=32141/4335π.c_7=\frac{32\,14^{1/4}\sqrt3}{35\pi}.

Therefore the proposed inequality c7AH4AH1c_7\|A\|_{H^4}\leq\|A\|_{H^1_*} is equivalent to

R625π42097152.R\leq\frac{625\pi^4}{2097152}.

In fact, exact rational interval arithmetic certifies

R>0.0290375624309815956692515439,625π42097152<0.0290301713448770157207370796,R625π42097152>71000000>0.\begin{aligned} R&>0.0290375624309815956692515439,\\ \frac{625\pi^4}{2097152} &<0.0290301713448770157207370796,\\ R-\frac{625\pi^4}{2097152} &>\frac7{1000000}>0. \end{aligned}

The certification uses integer-square-root bounds for 14\sqrt{14}, the positive-remainder expansion

logz=2j=0N1u2j+12j+1+εN,u=z1z+1,0<εN<2u2N+1(2N+1)(1u2),\log z =2\sum_{j=0}^{N-1}\frac{u^{2j+1}}{2j+1}+\varepsilon_N, \qquad u=\frac{z-1}{z+1}, \qquad 0<\varepsilon_N<\frac{2u^{2N+1}}{(2N+1)(1-u^2)},

and Machin's identity

π=16arctan ⁣(15)4arctan ⁣(1239).\pi=16\arctan\!\left(\frac15\right) -4\arctan\!\left(\frac1{239}\right).

Equivalently,

AH1AH4=0.974983033437249971<0.975045085220861666=c7.\frac{\|A\|_{H^1_*}}{\|A\|_{H^4}} =0.974983033437249971\ldots <0.975045085220861666\ldots =c_7.

Both aa and bb are positive, so AA is positive definite. Continuity gives a full-dimensional open family of counterexamples. Only the proposed lower constant is disproved; the separate upper inequality remains open.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel · · edited