Higher-modulus congruences for the 2-color overpartition function

From papers

Let p6(n)\overline{p}_{6}(n) and p8(n)\overline{p}_{8}(n) denote the 22-color overpartition functions with indicated color parameters, and let n0n\ge0. Higher-modulus congruence conjecture. For all n0n\ge0,

p8(32n+28)0(mod32),p6(24n+17)0(mod64),p6(24n+23)0(mod64).\begin{aligned} \overline{p}_{8}(32n+28)&\equiv0\pmod{32},\\ \overline{p}_{6}(24n+17)&\equiv0\pmod{64},\\ \overline{p}_{6}(24n+23)&\equiv0\pmod{64}. \end{aligned}

These congruences are suggested by computations as higher-modulus versions of congruences modulo 88; the paper states them as conjectures, with no proof given.

Progress summary

Open

The three proposed stronger divisibility patterns remain conjectures, with no publicly verified proof or counterexample found.

The conjecture asserts three divisibility statements for the 22-color overpartition function, strengthening previously proved congruences modulo lower powers of 22. The 2026 paper by H. S. Sumanth Bharadwaj, N. Sujatha, and S. Chandankumar records these statements as Conjecture 22 and supplies no proof.

July 2026 status

The detailed arXiv version confirms that p8(32n+28)0(mod32)\overline{p}_{8}(32n+28)\equiv0\pmod{32} and p6(24n+17),p6(24n+23)0(mod64)\overline{p}_{6}(24n+17),\overline{p}_{6}(24n+23)\equiv0\pmod{64} remain conjectural. The scan found no claimed proof, counterexample, verification, withdrawal, or referee report; the supplied community proof is therefore uncorroborated.

Current status (as of August 2026): The three higher-modulus congruences remain open; only their lower-modulus analogues are recorded as proved.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

H. S. Sumanth Bharadwaj, N. Sujatha and S. Chandankumar, “Arithmetic properties of the 2-color overpartition function p_(n)”, arXiv:2607.16608 (2026).

Solutions 1

Proof

All three congruences hold for every n0n\ge0. We prove them by holomorphic eta products and complete, explicitly reproducible Sturm certificates.

Put

fr=(qr;qr),n0p(n)qn=f2f2f12f2.f_r=(q^r;q^r)_\infty,\qquad \sum_{n\ge0}\overline p_\ell(n)q^n =\frac{f_2f_{2\ell}}{f_1^2f_\ell^2}.

Repeated use of the binomial theorem gives

fr2af2r2a1(mod2a).(1)f_r^{2^a}\equiv f_{2r}^{2^{a-1}}\pmod{2^a}. \tag{1}

The two =6\ell=6 congruences. The source's exact equation (3.5) gives

n0p6(3n+2)qn=4G(q),G(q)=f4f63f16.\sum_{n\ge0}\overline p_6(3n+2)q^n = 4G(q), \qquad G(q)=\frac{f_4f_6^3}{f_1^6}.

The two required progressions correspond to coefficients of GG in residue classes 5,7(mod8)5,7\pmod8, and these coefficients must vanish modulo 1616. By (1),

G(q)f810f158f4f63f82(mod16).G(q)f_8^{10} \equiv f_1^{58}f_4f_6^3f_8^2 \pmod{16}.

Since f8f_8 is a unit in Z[[q8]]\mathbb Z[[q^8]], multiplying by f810f_8^{10} preserves vanishing within each residue class. Form

E6(τ)=η(τ)58η(4τ)η(6τ)3η(8τ)2=q4f158f4f63f82.E_6(\tau) = \eta(\tau)^{58}\eta(4\tau)\eta(6\tau)^3\eta(8\tau)^2 = q^4f_1^{58}f_4f_6^3f_8^2.

The eta exponents satisfy

rδ=64,δrδ=96,(24/δ)rδ=1416.\sum r_\delta=64,\quad \sum\delta r_\delta=96,\quad \sum(24/\delta)r_\delta=1416.

Thus E6E_6 is holomorphic of weight 3232, level 2424, and character (6/)(6/\cdot); all exponents are nonnegative, so every cusp is holomorphic.

For r=1,3r=1,3, project using the four Dirichlet characters modulo 88:

S6,r=χmod8χ(r)(E6χ)=4jr (8)[qj]E6qj.S_{6,r} = \sum_{\chi\bmod8}\chi(r)(E_6\otimes\chi) = 4\sum_{j\equiv r\ (8)}[q^j]E_6\,q^j.

These are holomorphic forms of weight 3232, level 15361536, with index 30723072 and Sturm bound

B6=32307212=8192.B_6=\frac{32\cdot3072}{12}=8192.

The principal-character twist is the oldform E6(E6U2)V2E_6-(E_6|U_2)|V_2; the other twists have conductor dividing 88.

The exact coefficient recurrence below verifies both original progressions modulo 6464 through original index

3(B64)+2=24566:3(B_6-4)+2=24566:

there are exactly 10231023 checks for each progression. Therefore S6,1S6,30(mod64)S_{6,1}\equiv S_{6,3}\equiv0\pmod{64} through their Sturm bound, hence identically. Dividing the displayed character projections by 44 proves

p6(24n+17)p6(24n+23)0(mod64)(n0).\boxed{ \overline p_6(24n+17) \equiv \overline p_6(24n+23) \equiv0\pmod{64} \quad(n\ge0).}

The =8\ell=8 congruence. The source's exact equation (4.54) gives

A(q)=n0p8(4n)qn=f217f114f45.A(q) = \sum_{n\ge0}\overline p_8(4n)q^n = \frac{f_2^{17}}{f_1^{14}f_4^5}.

Equation (1) implies

A(q)f836f1114f217f427f84(mod32).A(q)f_8^{36} \equiv f_1^{114}f_2^{17}f_4^{27}f_8^4 \pmod{32}.

Set

E8(τ)=η(τ)114η(2τ)17η(4τ)27η(8τ)4=q12f1114f217f427f84.E_8(\tau) = \eta(\tau)^{114}\eta(2\tau)^{17} \eta(4\tau)^{27}\eta(8\tau)^4 = q^{12}f_1^{114}f_2^{17}f_4^{27}f_8^4.

Its eta exponent sums are 162,288,4152162,288,4152, giving a holomorphic form of weight 8181, level 3232, and character (2/)(-2/\cdot). The desired residue class becomes 3(mod8)3\pmod8 after the shift by 1212. Thus

S8,3=χmod8χ(3)(E8χ)=4j3 (8)[qj]E8qjS_{8,3} = \sum_{\chi\bmod8}\chi(3)(E_8\otimes\chi) = 4\sum_{j\equiv3\ (8)}[q^j]E_8\,q^j

has weight 8181, level 20482048, index 30723072, and Sturm bound

B8=81307212=20736.B_8=\frac{81\cdot3072}{12}=20736.

The exact recurrence verifies the original progression modulo 3232 through index

4(B812)=82896,4(B_8-12)=82896,

giving 25902590 checks. Therefore S8,30(mod128)S_{8,3}\equiv0\pmod{128} through the Sturm bound and hence identically. Dividing by 44 and undoing the invertible f8f_8 factor proves

p8(32n+28)0(mod32)(n0).\boxed{\overline p_8(32n+28)\equiv0\pmod{32} \quad(n\ge0).}

Reproducible exact Sturm certificate. All finite checks use only the following division-free integer recurrences:

a(0)=1,a(r)=2j2r(1)j+1a(rj2),a(0)=1,\qquad a(r)= 2\sum_{j^2\le r}(-1)^{j+1}a(r-j^2),

where a(r)=p(r)a(r)=\overline p(r), and

p(r)=j=0r/a(rj)a(j).\overline p_\ell(r) = \sum_{j=0}^{\lfloor r/\ell\rfloor} a(r-\ell j)a(j).

Compute a(r)(mod64)a(r)\pmod{64} for 0r828960\le r\le82896. Direct substitution gives

p6(24j+17)0(mod64)(0j1022),p6(24j+23)0(mod64)(0j1022),p8(32j+28)0(mod32)(0j2589).\begin{aligned} \overline p_6(24j+17)&\equiv0\pmod{64} && (0\le j\le1022),\\ \overline p_6(24j+23)&\equiv0\pmod{64} && (0\le j\le1022),\\ \overline p_8(32j+28)&\equiv0\pmod{32} && (0\le j\le2589). \end{aligned}

These cover the complete bounds above; Sturm's theorem supplies the all-nn conclusions.

Source: H. S. Sumanth Bharadwaj, N. Sujatha and S. Chandankumar, arXiv:2607.16608, equations (3.5), (4.54), and Conjecture 2, equations (5.4)–(5.6).

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·