Lin's multivariable matrix Young conjecture

Let MnM_n denote the set of nn by nn complex matrices. For X∈MnX\in M_n, write

∣X∣=(X∗X)1/2.|X|=(X^*X)^{1/2}.

For Hermitian matrices XX and YY, write X⪯YX\preceq Y when Y−XY-X is positive semidefinite. Let A1,…,Am∈MnA_1,\ldots,A_m\in M_n be positive semidefinite, and let p1,…,pm>0p_1,\ldots,p_m>0 satisfy

1p1+⋯+1pm=1.\frac1{p_1}+\cdots+\frac1{p_m}=1.

The eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix HH are ordered as λ1(H)≥λ2(H)≥⋯≥λn(H)\lambda_1(H)\geq\lambda_2(H)\geq\cdots\geq\lambda_n(H).

Lin's conjecture. There exists a unitary matrix U∈MnU\in M_n such that

U∣A1⋯Am∣U∗⪯1p1A1p1+⋯+1pmAmpm.U|A_1\cdots A_m|U^*\preceq \frac1{p_1}A_1^{p_1}+\cdots+\frac1{p_m}A_m^{p_m}.

Equivalently, for j=1,…,nj=1,\ldots,n,

λj(∣A1⋯Am∣)≤λj(1p1A1p1+⋯+1pmAmpm).\lambda_j(|A_1\cdots A_m|) \leq \lambda_j\left( \frac1{p_1}A_1^{p_1}+\cdots+\frac1{p_m}A_m^{p_m} \right).

This is a multivariable extension of matrix Young inequalities in which the order of the factors matters. The conjecture was proposed by Lin, but the paper shows that it fails for every m≥3m\geq3: for m≥4m\geq4 there are uniform 2×22\times2 counterexamples, while m=3m=3 is disproved by a 3×33\times3 positive semidefinite example.

References

Primary source

Zhekai Pang, “Counterexamples to a multivariable matrix Young conjecture”, arXiv:2607.11866 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.