The odd-cycle naive-dimension conjecture
Fix an odd cycle , with , and let denote the minimum dimension of an isometric embedding of into an abelian Cayley graph. Encode the edge-generator dependencies by the binary code
The code contains the all-ones vector, and for every cyclic interval isometry requires
Odd-cycle naive-dimension conjecture. The cyclic interval lemma holds for every odd ; consequently,
for every odd cycle. The claim is proved in the paper for every odd and for any further odd for which the cyclic interval lemma holds; the general case remains open.
References
Primary source
Fokam Souop Rigobert and Bitjoka Laurent, “Dimension and Order Bounds for Isometric Embeddings of Graphs into Abelian Cayley Graphs, and the Abelian Dividend”, arXiv:2607.07939 (2026).
Progress summary
A July 2026 preprint verifies the conjecture only for small odd cycles, while an unverified submission claims a proof for every odd cycle.
The conjecture predicts that the cyclic-interval condition always holds and therefore that for every odd . Fokam Souop and Bitjoka formulate the reduction in their 2026 preprint.
Known results; July 2026 preprint
- Fokam Souop and Bitjoka (2026) prove the dimension formula in the finite checked range, reported as odd .
- For any further odd satisfying the cyclic-interval lemma, their reduction gives .
- The preprint does not prove the lemma for all odd and reports no counterexample or independent verification.
Community submission (unverified)
A submitted proof argues, via averaging over cyclic intervals of lengths and for , that every nonempty proper subset is strictly closer to some interval than to the trivial alternatives; it then claims the full formula . The argument has not been independently verified.
Current status (as of August 2026): The formula is established in the finite checked range and conditionally beyond it when the cyclic-interval lemma holds; the all-odd case remains open because the submitted proof is unverified.
Sources
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
Proof of the cyclic-interval conjecture and the exact binary dimension of every odd cycle
Fokam Souop and Bitjoka, arXiv:2607.07939v1, Lemma 3 and Conjecture 1, ask whether, for every odd integer and every nonempty proper subset , there exists a cyclic interval satisfying
They prove this in one special geometric regime and verify the remaining cases only for . We prove (1) for every odd , and then derive the full conjectured binary embedding dimension.
An averaging identity for cyclic intervals
Write
For and , define the cyclic interval
Each element of belongs to exactly of these intervals. Therefore
The necessary interval length depends only on the parity of .
Case 1: is odd. Take . From (4), the average intersection size is
where strictness follows from . Since intersection sizes are integers, some interval satisfies
Consequently,
Case 2: is even. Take . This time (4) gives
since . Thus some interval satisfies
It follows that
Together, (7) and (10) prove (1) for every nonempty proper and every odd .
Consequence: the exact dimension of every odd cycle
Let have cyclically ordered vertices , and suppose it embeds isometrically into a binary Cayley graph on . For each edge define its generator
Because the edges close to a cycle,
Introduce the dependency space
Equation (12) states that the all-ones vector belongs to . If the generators had rank at most , then , so would contain the indicator of some nonempty proper subset .
Choose the cyclic interval supplied by (1). If its endpoints on are and , then
Every is an allowed generator of the host Cayley graph. Hence (14) exhibits a host walk from to of length at most . But (1) gives
contradicting isometry. Therefore
For completeness, this lower bound is attained. In take
Their only nonzero binary dependency uses all generators. Set
For an arc , the only generator subsets representing its endpoint difference are and its complement. Because repeated generators cancel in characteristic , the host distance is exactly
Thus this embedding is isometric, proving the full conjecture: