The Mumford–Tate conjecture for smooth projective varieties

Let XX be a smooth projective variety defined over a finitely generated subfield FCF\subset\mathbb{C}. Under the Artin comparison identification

GL(H(Xan,Q)Q)GL(Heˊt(XF,Q)),\operatorname{GL}(H^*(X^{\mathrm{an}},\mathbb{Q})\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})\simeq \operatorname{GL}(H^*_{\operatorname{\acute{e}t}}(X_{\overline{F}},\mathbb{Q}_{\ell})),

let MT(X)GL(H(Xan,Q))\operatorname{MT}(X)\subset\operatorname{GL}(H^*(X^{\mathrm{an}},\mathbb{Q})) be the Mumford–Tate group and let G(X)G_{\ell}(X)^{\circ} be the identity component of the Zariski closure of the \ell-adic Galois representation. Mumford–Tate conjecture.

MT(X)Q=G(X).\operatorname{MT}(X)\otimes\mathbb{Q}_{\ell}=G_{\ell}(X)^{\circ}.

This conjecture provides a characteristic-zero strategy for the Tate conjecture by relating the Hodge-theoretic Mumford–Tate group to the arithmetic monodromy group; its general status remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Salvatore Floccari and Lie Fu, “The hyper-Kummer construction”, arXiv:2607.07528 (2026).

Additional references

29 papers in this index state this conjecture (1996–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2510.10403, arXiv:2504.13607, arXiv:2502.10799, arXiv:2405.20394, arXiv:2305.19134, arXiv:2303.00804, arXiv:2302.13016, arXiv:2211.03909, arXiv:2208.02345, arXiv:2112.12815, arXiv:2111.01126, arXiv:2009.07441, and 16 more.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.