Prasad's adjoint L-function criterion for degenerate Whittaker vanishing

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let FF be a non-Archimedean local field, let G=GL⁡2n(F)G=\operatorname{GL}_{2n}(F), and let Pn,n=MNP_{n,n}=MN be the standard parabolic subgroup with Levi factor M≃GL⁡n(F)×GL⁡n(F)M\simeq\operatorname{GL}_n(F)\times\operatorname{GL}_n(F). For a fixed nondegenerate character ψ\psi of NN, write πN,ψ\pi_{N,\psi} for the twisted Jacquet module of an irreducible smooth representation π\pi of GG. Define

pord⁡s=tL(s,π×π∨)\operatorname{pord}_{s=t}L(s,\pi\times\pi^\vee)

to be the order of the pole at s=ts=t of the adjoint LL-function L(s,π×π∨)L(s,\pi\times\pi^\vee). Prasad's conjecture. The twisted Jacquet module vanishes if and only if

πN,ψ=0\pi_{N,\psi}=0

if and only if

pord⁡s=tL(s,π×π∨)≥n−t+1(1≤t≤n).\operatorname{pord}_{s=t}L(s,\pi\times\pi^\vee)\geq n-t+1\qquad(1\leq t\leq n).

The paper proves that vanishing of πN,ψ\pi_{N,\psi} implies the predicted pole inequalities, but gives an explicit counterexample to the converse for GL⁡4(F)\operatorname{GL}_4(F); hence the conjecture is refuted.

References

Primary source

Taiwang Deng, “A degenerate Whittaker criterion for GL_2n”, arXiv:2607.01598 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.