Macroscopic boundary conjecture for the left side of the t-split two-periodic Aztec diamond

From papers

Let tt, xx, and yy denote the split parameter and macroscopic coordinates, and let rα,2(z)r_{\alpha,2}(z) and rβ,2(z)r_{\beta,2}(z) be the functions appearing in the correlation-kernel asymptotics. Define the saddle function

φα,β(z;x,y)=(1+y)logzlog(z1)+(tx)logrα,2(z)+(1/2t)logrβ,2(z).\varphi_{\alpha,\beta}(z;x,y)=(1+y)\log z-\log(z-1)+(t-x)\log r_{\alpha,2}(z)+(1/2-t)\log r_{\beta,2}(z).

Macroscopic boundary conjecture. The macroscopic boundary of the tt-split two-periodic Aztec diamond to the left of the interface is governed by this saddle function: the boundary corresponds to the coalescence of critical points, as in the two-periodic model. This conjecture predicts that the left macroscopic boundary can be identified through the saddle-point analysis of the limiting kernel, extending the corresponding mechanism from the two-periodic model to the split model. The source gives no resolution status.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Meredith Shea, “The t-Split Two-Periodic Aztec Diamond Model”, arXiv:2606.19507 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.