Macroscopic boundary conjecture for the left side of the t-split two-periodic Aztec diamond

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let tt, xx, and yy denote the split parameter and macroscopic coordinates, and let rα,2(z)r_{\alpha,2}(z) and rβ,2(z)r_{\beta,2}(z) be the functions appearing in the correlation-kernel asymptotics. Define the saddle function

φα,β(z;x,y)=(1+y)log⁡z−log⁡(z−1)+(t−x)log⁡rα,2(z)+(1/2−t)log⁡rβ,2(z).\varphi_{\alpha,\beta}(z;x,y)=(1+y)\log z-\log(z-1)+(t-x)\log r_{\alpha,2}(z)+(1/2-t)\log r_{\beta,2}(z).

Macroscopic boundary conjecture. The macroscopic boundary of the tt-split two-periodic Aztec diamond to the left of the interface is governed by this saddle function: the boundary corresponds to the coalescence of critical points, as in the two-periodic model. This conjecture predicts that the left macroscopic boundary can be identified through the saddle-point analysis of the limiting kernel, extending the corresponding mechanism from the two-periodic model to the split model. The source gives no resolution status.

References

Primary source

Meredith Shea, “The t-Split Two-Periodic Aztec Diamond Model”, arXiv:2606.19507 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.