Transcendence of simple geodesics in finite modular covers

Let Γ=PSL2(Z)\Gamma=\operatorname{PSL}_2(\mathbb{Z}), let ΓΓ\Gamma^\prime\subset\Gamma be a finite-index subgroup corresponding to a finite cover MM\mathbf{M}^\prime\to\mathbf{M}, and let

G(HP)=RP1×RP1diagonal\mathcal{G}(\mathbf{HP})=\mathbb{R}\operatorname{\mathbf{P}}^1\times\mathbb{R}\operatorname{\mathbf{P}}^1\setminus\mathrm{diagonal}

be the space of geodesics of the hyperbolic plane. For a geodesic ξ=(ξ,ξ+)G(HP)\xi=(\xi^-,\xi^+)\in\mathcal{G}(\mathbf{HP}), let ξ\xi^\prime be its projection modulo Γ\Gamma^\prime to G(M)\mathcal{G}(\mathbf{M}^\prime). A geodesic is simple when it has no transverse self-intersection in M\mathbf{M}^\prime. Transcendence of simple geodesics in finite modular covers. If ξ\xi^\prime is simple, then ξ+RP1\xi^+\in\mathbb{R}\operatorname{\mathbf{P}}^1 is either rational, quadratic, or transcendental. The bounded-cusp-excursion lemma shows that simple geodesics have bounded continued-fraction digits, so this conjecture is a finite-cover analogue of Khintchine's conjecture; it remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Christopher-Lloyd Simon, “Transcendence of simple geodesics on finite modular covers”, arXiv:2606.08842 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.