Schwartz's discreteness conjecture for complex hyperbolic triangle groups

Let p,q,rp,q,r be positive integers such that pqrp\leqslant q\leqslant r and

1p+1q+1r<1.\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}<1.

Let (L1,L2,L3)(L_1,L_2,L_3) be a (p,q,r;α)(p,q,r;\alpha)-triangle in complex hyperbolic 2-space, let IkPU(2,1)I_k\in\mathrm{PU}(2,1) be inversion in LkL_k, and let the associated (p,q,r;α)(p,q,r;\alpha) representation of the triangle group Δp,q,r\Delta_{p,q,r} send its generators to I1,I2,I3I_1,I_2,I_3. Define

WA=I1I3I2I3,WB=I1I2I3.W_A=I_1I_3I_2I_3,\qquad W_B=I_1I_2I_3.

Schwartz's conjecture. The (p,q,r;α)(p,q,r;\alpha) representation of Δp,q,r\Delta_{p,q,r} is discrete and faithful if and only if WAW_A and WBW_B are non-elliptic. Furthermore, if p<10p<10, it is discrete and faithful if and only if WAW_A is non-elliptic, while if p>13p>13, it is discrete and faithful if and only if WBW_B is non-elliptic. This conjecture proposes trace-type criteria for discreteness and faithfulness of complex hyperbolic triangle-group representations; the supplied text does not state whether it has been proved or disproved.

Equivalent formulations 2

Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.

  1. Schwartz's discreteness conjecture for complex hyperbolic triangle groups

    Let Δ(p,q,r;θ)PU(2,1)\Delta(p,q,r;\theta)\subset \operatorname{PU}(2,1) be the complex hyperbolic triangle group generated by complex reflections I1,I2,I3I_1,I_2,I_3, and let

    Λ(p,q,r)=a,b,c  |  a2=b2=c2=e, (ab)p=(bc)q=(ca)r=e\Lambda(p,q,r)=\left\langle a,b,c\;\middle\vert\;a^2=b^2=c^2=e,\ (ab)^p=(bc)^q=(ca)^r=e\right\rangle

    be the corresponding abstract triangle group, with I3I2I1I2I_3I_2I_1I_2 and I1I2I3I_1I_2I_3 the specified elements of Δ(p,q,r;θ)\Delta(p,q,r;\theta). Schwartz's conjecture. The group Δ(p,q,r;θ)\Delta(p,q,r;\theta) is a discrete and injective representation of Λ(p,q,r)\Lambda(p,q,r) in PU(2,1)\operatorname{PU}(2,1) if and only if I3I2I1I2I_3I_2I_1I_2 and I1I2I3I_1I_2I_3 are both not elliptic. This conjecture gives a criterion for discreteness and faithfulness of complex hyperbolic triangle-group representations; the supplied source does not state whether it has been resolved.

    source: Raphaël Alexandre, “Redundancy of triangle groups in spherical CR representations”, arXiv:2006.09089 (2021).

  2. Schwartz's discreteness conjecture for complex hyperbolic triangle groups

    Let p,q,rp,q,r satisfy 3pqr3\leq p\leq q\leq r. Consider a representation of the triangle group Γp,q,r\Gamma_{p,q,r} into PU(2,1)\operatorname{PU}(2,1) obtained by sending the standard generators to order-two complex reflections I1,I2,I3I_1,I_2,I_3. Define

    WA=I3I2I1I2,WB=I1I2I3.W_A=I_3I_2I_1I_2,\qquad W_B=I_1I_2I_3.

    Schwartz's conjecture. The representation is discrete and faithful if and only if neither WAW_A nor WBW_B is elliptic.

    This conjecture predicts that discreteness and faithfulness of these complex hyperbolic triangle-group representations are determined by the isometry types of the two words WAW_A and WBW_B. The source attributes the conjecture to Schwartz; its resolution status is not specified in the supplied text.

    source: Arielle Marc-Zwecker, “Triangle groups in the complex hyperbolic plane and special fibers of the momentum map in PU(2,1)”, arXiv:2304.10329 (2023).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ulysse Remfort-Aurat, “Simple-stable representations of surface groups in PU(2,1)”, arXiv:2605.28891 (2026).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2021–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2101.09861.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.