Bruzzo's conjecture on semistability and vanishing discriminant for Higgs bundles

Let XX be a smooth projective variety of dimension nn, and let E=(E,θ)\mathcal{E}=(E,\theta) be a Higgs bundle on XX of rank rr. Define its discriminant by

Δ(E)=2rc2(E)−(r−1)c12(E).\Delta(E)=2rc_2(E)-(r-1)c_1^2(E).

For a smooth projective curve CC and a morphism f:C⟶Xf:C\longrightarrow X, write f∗Ef^*\mathcal{E} for the induced Higgs bundle; say that E\mathcal{E} is curve Higgs semistable when f∗Ef^*\mathcal{E} is Higgs semistable for every such ff. A polarization HH is an ample divisor class on XX.

Bruzzo's conjecture. The following conditions are equivalent:

  1. E\mathcal{E} is semistable with respect to some polarization HH and
Δ(E)⋅Hn−2=0.\Delta(E)\cdot H^{n-2}=0.
  1. For every morphism f:C⟶Xf:C\longrightarrow X from a smooth projective curve CC, the Higgs bundle f∗Ef^*\mathcal{E} is Higgs semistable; equivalently, E\mathcal{E} is curve Higgs semistable.

The implication from condition (1) to condition (2) is known, while the converse is the remaining direction of the conjecture.

References

Primary source

Krishna Hanumanthu, Snehajit Misra and Nabanita Ray, “Seshadri constants of Higgs Vector bundles”, arXiv:2605.25776 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.