Rank-two conjecture for groups even on maximal proper subsets

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let [m][m] and [n′][n'] be the two underlying sets of sizes mm and nn, and let Γm⊕n\Gamma_{m\oplus n} denote the group of permutations that are even on every maximal proper subset of their disjoint union. For a group GG, write rank⁡(G)\operatorname{rank}(G) for its minimum number of generators.

Rank-two conjecture. If m⩾n⩾2m\geqslant n\geqslant 2 and

(m,n)∉{(2,2),(3,3),(4,3),(4,4)},(m,n)\notin\{(2,2),(3,3),(4,3),(4,4)\},

then

rank⁡(Γm⊕n)=2.\operatorname{rank}(\Gamma_{m\oplus n})=2.

The conjecture is motivated by extensive GAP computations: the four excluded cases include the exceptional small cases, while the other checked examples have rank two. The claim is left open.

References

Primary source

Vítor H. Fernandes, “Groups of permutations that are even on maximal proper subsets, and related monoids”, arXiv:2605.12342 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

The paper leaves the question open, while an unverified reader-submitted argument claims to settle all cases.

Vítor H. Fernandes’s May 2026 paper formulates the conjecture that these groups need two generators outside four small exceptional pairs. It leaves the general claim open.

Known results

  • A three-generator set exists for every m,n≥2m,n\geq 2.
  • Γ2⊕2\Gamma_{2\oplus2} has rank 11.
  • The pairs (3,3)(3,3), (4,3)(4,3), and (4,4)(4,4) have rank 33 by GAP computation.
  • Two generators are proved when the relevant cycle lengths are coprime; further computations find rank 22 for examples including (5,5)(5,5) and (9,4)(9,4) (Fernandes, 2026).

Community submission (unverified)

A submitted proof argues for the complete classification: rank 11 at (2,2)(2,2), rank 33 at (3,3)(3,3), (4,3)(4,3), and (4,4)(4,4), and rank 22 in every other case. This claim has no independent verification in the retrieved sources.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture remains open in the published paper; a reader-submitted proof claims a complete resolution, but it is unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Claim. Let m≥n≥2m\geq n\geq2, and let

Γm⊕n={(σ,τ)∈Sm×Sn:sgn⁡(σ)=sgn⁡(τ)}.(1)\Gamma_{m\oplus n} = \left\{ (\sigma,\tau)\in S_m\times S_n: \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=\operatorname{sgn}(\tau) \right\}. \tag{1}

Then the complete minimum-generator classification is

rank⁡(Γm⊕n)={1,(m,n)=(2,2),3,(m,n)∈{(3,3),(4,3),(4,4)},2,otherwise.(2)\operatorname{rank}(\Gamma_{m\oplus n}) = \begin{cases} 1,&(m,n)=(2,2),\\ 3,&(m,n)\in\{(3,3),(4,3),(4,4)\},\\ 2,&\text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \tag{2}

In particular, this proves Conjecture 1 of Vítor H. Fernandes, Groups of permutations that are even on maximal proper subsets, and related monoids, arXiv:2605.12342v1. The source identifies its group with (1), supplies a three-generator upper bound, and proves the two-generator assertion only for certain coprime cycle lengths. Here all cycle lengths, including equal block sizes, are covered uniformly.

Step 1: Convenient symmetric-group generators. For every d≥2d\geq2, define

td=(1 2),ud={(1 2 ⋯ d),d odd,(2 3 ⋯ d),d even.(3)t_d=(1\ 2), \qquad u_d= \begin{cases} (1\ 2\ \cdots\ d),&d\text{ odd},\\ (2\ 3\ \cdots\ d),&d\text{ even}. \end{cases} \tag{3}

For d=2d=2, the second expression means u2=1u_2=1. In every case tdt_d is odd, udu_d is even, and

⟨td,ud⟩=Sd.(4)\langle t_d,u_d\rangle=S_d. \tag{4}

Indeed, when dd is odd, conjugating tdt_d by powers of the full cycle gives the transpositions along a connected cycle. When dd is even, the same conjugation gives the transpositions joining the fixed point 11 to every other point. Transpositions along either connected graph generate the full symmetric group.

We will use the standard subdirect-product form of Goursat's lemma. If

H≤G1×G2(5)H\leq G_1\times G_2 \tag{5}

projects onto both factors, then there are normal subgroups Ni⊴GiN_i\trianglelefteq G_i and an isomorphism

G1/N1≅G2/N2(6)G_1/N_1\cong G_2/N_2 \tag{6}

such that HH consists exactly of pairs whose images in this common quotient agree. Explicitly,

N1={x∈G1:(x,1)∈H},N2={y∈G2:(1,y)∈H}.(7)N_1=\{x\in G_1:(x,1)\in H\}, \qquad N_2=\{y\in G_2:(1,y)\in H\}. \tag{7}

The common quotient is trivial exactly when H=G1×G2H=G_1\times G_2.

For d≥5d\geq5, the normal subgroups of SdS_d are

1,Ad,Sd.(8)1,\quad A_d,\quad S_d. \tag{8}

Thus its nontrivial quotients are SdS_d and C2C_2. The smaller cases are

Gnontrivial quotient groupsS2C2S3S3, C2S4S4, S3, C2,(9)\begin{array}{c|c} G&\text{nontrivial quotient groups}\\ \hline S_2&C_2\\ S_3&S_3,\ C_2\\ S_4&S_4,\ S_3,\ C_2, \end{array} \tag{9}

where the additional S3S_3 quotient comes from

S4/V4≅S3.(10)S_4/V_4\cong S_3. \tag{10}

The exceptional outer automorphism of S6S_6 does not alter (8) or its quotient list.

Step 2: Unequal block sizes. Suppose m>n≥2m>n\geq2 and (m,n)≠(4,3)(m,n)\neq(4,3). Consider the two elements

g=(tm,tn),h=(um,un)(11)g=(t_m,t_n), \qquad h=(u_m,u_n) \tag{11}

of Γm⊕n\Gamma_{m\oplus n}. By (4), the subgroup

H=⟨g,h⟩(12)H=\langle g,h\rangle \tag{12}

projects onto both SmS_m and SnS_n.

Since HH is contained in the parity fiber product (1), it cannot be the entire direct product. Therefore its Goursat quotient is nontrivial. By (8)–(9), the only common nontrivial quotient of SmS_m and SnS_n is C2C_2: distinct symmetric groups have different orders, and the sole additional coincidence for unequal sizes is the excluded pair

S4/V4≅S3.(13)S_4/V_4\cong S_3. \tag{13}

For every d≥2d\geq2, the unique quotient homomorphism from SdS_d onto C2C_2 is the sign homomorphism. Consequently Goursat's description gives

H={(σ,τ):sgn⁡(σ)=sgn⁡(τ)}=Γm⊕n.(14)H = \{(\sigma,\tau): \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)=\operatorname{sgn}(\tau)\} = \Gamma_{m\oplus n}. \tag{14}

This includes all cases n=2n=2, since u2=1u_2=1 and (4) still holds.

Step 3: Equal block sizes. Suppose m=n=d≥5m=n=d\geq5, and put

c=(3 4 5)∈Sd.(15)c=(3\ 4\ 5)\in S_d. \tag{15}

The permutations tdt_d and cc have disjoint supports, so

(tdc)3=td,ord⁡(td)=2,ord⁡(tdc)=6.(16)(t_dc)^3=t_d, \qquad \operatorname{ord}(t_d)=2, \qquad \operatorname{ord}(t_dc)=6. \tag{16}

Consider instead

g=(td,tdc),h=(ud,ud).(17)g=(t_d,t_dc), \qquad h=(u_d,u_d). \tag{17}

Both coordinates of gg are odd, both coordinates of hh are even, and hence both generators belong to Γd⊕d\Gamma_{d\oplus d}. The first projection generates SdS_d by (4). The second projection also generates SdS_d, because (16) recovers tdt_d from tdct_dc, after which (4) applies again.

Let H=⟨g,h⟩H=\langle g,h\rangle. By (8), its nontrivial Goursat quotient is either C2C_2 or SdS_d. If that quotient were SdS_d, then HH would be the graph of an automorphism

φ:Sd⟶Sd.(18)\varphi:S_d\longrightarrow S_d. \tag{18}

Since g∈Hg\in H, this would imply

φ(td)=tdc.(19)\varphi(t_d)=t_dc. \tag{19}

But automorphisms preserve element orders, whereas (16) gives orders 22 and 66. This is impossible, even for d=6d=6, where an outer automorphism exists. Hence the common quotient is C2C_2, and the same sign argument as in (14) proves

⟨(td,tdc),(ud,ud)⟩=Γd⊕d(d≥5).(20)\langle(t_d,t_dc),(u_d,u_d)\rangle = \Gamma_{d\oplus d} \qquad(d\geq5). \tag{20}

Whenever m>2m>2, the group Γm⊕n\Gamma_{m\oplus n} projects onto the noncyclic group SmS_m. Thus it is itself noncyclic, so the two generators in (14) and (20) are minimal.

Step 4: Determine all exceptional ranks. First,

Γ2⊕2={(1,1),(t2,t2)}≅C2,(21)\Gamma_{2\oplus2} = \{(1,1),(t_2,t_2)\} \cong C_2, \tag{21}

so its rank is one.

Next let

E=Γ3⊕3.(22)E=\Gamma_{3\oplus3}. \tag{22}

Its even-even subgroup is

V=A3×A3≅C32,(23)V=A_3\times A_3\cong C_3^2, \tag{23}

and any diagonal odd-odd transposition acts on VV by inversion in both coordinates. Therefore

E≅C32⋊C2,(24)E\cong C_3^2\rtimes C_2, \tag{24}

with the nonidentity element of C2C_2 acting as multiplication by −1-1.

No two elements generate EE. If both belong to VV, their subgroup misses the odd coset. If exactly one belongs to VV, conjugation by the other only changes that single vector to its negative. If both belong to the odd coset, their product is a single vector of VV, and conjugation again only changes its sign. In the latter two cases the generated subgroup meets VV in a subspace of dimension at most one, whereas VV has dimension two. Thus

rank⁡(E)≥3.(25)\operatorname{rank}(E)\geq3. \tag{25}

Because V4⊂A4V_4\subset A_4, the quotient map in (10) preserves sign. Applying it in the S4S_4 coordinate, or in both S4S_4 coordinates, gives surjections

Γ4⊕3↠E,Γ4⊕4↠E.(26)\Gamma_{4\oplus3}\twoheadrightarrow E, \qquad \Gamma_{4\oplus4}\twoheadrightarrow E. \tag{26}

Consequently both groups also require at least three generators.

For completeness, the universal three-generator upper bound follows directly from

(tm,tn),(um,1),(1,un).(27)(t_m,t_n), \qquad (u_m,1), \qquad (1,u_n). \tag{27}

Indeed, the normal closure of udu_d in Sd=⟨td,ud⟩S_d=\langle t_d,u_d\rangle is exactly AdA_d: it is contained in AdA_d, while its quotient is generated by the image of the involution tdt_d and therefore has order at most two. Thus the subgroup generated by (27) contains

Am×1,1×An,(tm,tn),(28)A_m\times1, \qquad 1\times A_n, \qquad (t_m,t_n), \tag{28}

which together generate the entire parity fiber product. Therefore all three groups in (25)–(26) have rank exactly three. Combining this with (14), (20), and (21) proves the complete classification (2).