Adiprasito–Kazhdan–Ziegler partition-rank versus analytic-rank conjecture

Let K\mathbb{K} be a finite field, let d2d\geq 2 be an integer, and let

fHom(Kn1××Knd,K).f\in\operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb{K}^{n_1}\times\cdots\times\mathbb{K}^{n_d},\mathbb{K}).

Here PRK(f)\operatorname{PR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f) is the partition rank and ARK(f)\operatorname{AR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f) is the analytic rank of ff. Adiprasito–Kazhdan–Ziegler's partition-rank versus analytic-rank conjecture. One has

PRK(f)dARK(f).\operatorname{PR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f)\asymp_d\operatorname{AR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f).

The relation d\asymp_d denotes linear equivalence with constants depending on dd. The conjecture is known up to a logarithmic factor, but the exact linear equivalence remains open according to the source.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Qiyuan Chen and Ke Ye, “Geometry of multilinear varieties over infinite fields and its applications”, arXiv:2605.04859 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.