Adiprasito–Kazhdan–Ziegler partition-rank versus analytic-rank conjecture

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let K\mathbb{K} be a finite field, let d≥2d\geq 2 be an integer, and let

f∈Hom⁡(Kn1×⋯×Knd,K).f\in\operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb{K}^{n_1}\times\cdots\times\mathbb{K}^{n_d},\mathbb{K}).

Here PR⁡K(f)\operatorname{PR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f) is the partition rank and AR⁡K(f)\operatorname{AR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f) is the analytic rank of ff. Adiprasito–Kazhdan–Ziegler's partition-rank versus analytic-rank conjecture. One has

PR⁡K(f)≍dAR⁡K(f).\operatorname{PR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f)\asymp_d\operatorname{AR}_{\mathbb{K}}(f).

The relation ≍d\asymp_d denotes linear equivalence with constants depending on dd. The conjecture is known up to a logarithmic factor, but the exact linear equivalence remains open according to the source.

References

Primary source

Qiyuan Chen and Ke Ye, “Geometry of multilinear varieties over infinite fields and its applications”, arXiv:2605.04859 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.