Dean's conjecture on cycles divisible by the minimum-degree bound
All graphs under consideration are finite and simple. For a graph and a vertex , let denote the degree of . Dean's conjecture. For every integer , every graph with minimum degree at least contains a cycle of length divisible by . The conjecture is known to be true for all , so the case remains open.
References
Primary source
Ilkyoo Choi, Hojin Chu, Ringi Kim and Boram Park, “Existence of cycles of length divisible by 3 or 4”, arXiv:2605.02731 (2026).
Additional references
2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2601.13552.
Progress summary
A reader-submitted proof claims to settle the remaining five-dimensional case, but no independent verification has been found.
Dean’s conjecture, attributed to Nathaniel Dean in 1988, says that minimum degree at least forces a cycle whose length is divisible by . All cases except are recorded as settled; the submission concerns precisely this remaining case.
Known results
- : proved by Chen and Saito.
- : proved by Dean, Lesniak, and Saito.
- : Liu, Ma, and Zhao proved a stronger modular-cycle theorem in 2026.
- The literature explicitly leaves for separate arguments.
Community submission (unverified), August 31, 2026
A submitted proof claims that a counterexample with minimum degree at least can be reduced to a zero-free -weak graph, then eliminated through bipartite, triangle-containing, and nonbipartite triangle-free cases. The supplied text is only a summary, so the claimed proof has not been independently checked.
Current status (as of August 2026): Cases and are settled, while the case has only an unverified community-submitted proof claim.
Sources
- github.com
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathoverflow.net
- math.stackexchange.com
- math.emory.edu
- openproblemgarden.org
- scientificamerican.com
- cdn.openai.com
- arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- arxiv.org
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- mathstodon.xyz
- quantamagazine.org
- cdn.openai.com
- cdn.openai.com
- quantamagazine.org
- x.com
Solutions 1
ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solution
You can find the full proof (v1.0.1 as of Aug 31) here: https://zenodo.org/records/22182448
A brief summary of the proof is as follows:
Suppose for contradiction that is a finite simple graph with but contains no cycle whose length is divisible by . Call a cycle with
a zero-cycle, and call a graph with no zero-cycle zero-free.
The proof first reduces an arbitrary zero-free counterexample to a much more rigid class of graphs called -weak graphs. Starting from , one passes to a -connected subgraph in which all but possibly one vertex still have degree at least . The structure of the -cuts of such a zero-free graph is then analyzed. This forces to have one of two forms:
- Type I: is -connected and all but possibly one vertex have degree at least .
- Type II: has a unique degree- vertex with neighbors , and replacing the path by the edge produces a -connected graph of minimum degree at least .
Thus, if a counterexample exists, there is a zero-free -weak graph .
The rest of the proof establishes that no such graph can exist. Every -weak graph falls into one of the three exhaustive cases
1. Bipartite case
Suppose is bipartite and zero-free. Since all cycles are even, the goal is to force an even cycle whose length is .
The argument chooses a maximal structured subgraph built from -cycles, called a tetragonal core, and studies how the rest of the graph can attach to it. Degree and connectivity conditions force many exterior attachments, while zero-freeness strongly restricts the possible lengths of paths through those attachments.
The possible tetragonal cores are eventually reduced to three small parameter cases. Each of these configurations is ruled out by a detailed structural analysis, so a zero-free bipartite -weak graph cannot exist. Hence every bipartite -weak graph contains a zero-cycle.
2. Graphs containing a triangle
Now suppose contains a triangle. Starting from a triangle, the proof grows a maximal trigonal core by repeatedly adding vertices along boundary edges.
A key feature of such a core is that a trigonal graph on vertices contains cycles of every length
Consequently, a sufficiently large trigonal core would automatically contain five consecutive cycle lengths, one of which must be divisible by . Therefore, in a zero-free graph, a maximal trigonal core must be very small.
The remaining possibilities are a triangle itself or a -vertex core, abstractly of the form or . The high-degree and connectivity assumptions force enough paths outside the core to create several consecutive cycle lengths. Again, one of these lengths is , contradicting zero-freeness.
Thus every -weak graph containing a triangle contains a zero-cycle.
3. Nonbipartite, triangle-free case
This is the most involved case. Choose a shortest odd cycle . Because is shortest, it is induced, and triangle-freeness severely restricts how vertices outside may attach to it.
The proof studies the components outside , their attachment points on , and the collection of paths they create between vertices of . Combining these exterior paths with the two possible routes around produces cycles of many different residues modulo . The degree and -connectivity conditions guarantee that there are enough such attachments to force a zero-cycle.
The argument is carried out separately for the two forms of -weak graphs:
- In Type I, the -connected structure around a shortest odd cycle directly forces the required collection of cycle lengths.
- In Type II, write . If is nonbipartite, the shortest-odd-cycle analysis applies again. If is bipartite, a separate structural argument produces a simple -- path with
Adding the path , which has length , gives a cycle of length
Hence every nonbipartite triangle-free -weak graph also contains a zero-cycle.
Combining the three cases proves that every -weak graph contains a zero-cycle. But the initial reduction says that any zero-free graph with would contain a zero-free -weak graph . This is a contradiction.
Therefore every finite simple graph satisfying
contains a cycle such that
NOTE: This proof was developed with substantial use of LLMs, chiefly GPT 5.6 Sol, with Opus 5 and GLM 5.3 Flash as ancillary support. This proof has undergone multiple full-length adversarial audits, but has not yet been reviewed by an independent mathematician. This proof was authored by Elias Botsford.