Dimension conjecture for Schur squares of HRS codes

From papers

Let pp, mm, rr, ss, and tt be positive integers with pp prime, let α=(α1,,αr)(Fpm)r\boldsymbol{\alpha}=(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_r)\in(\mathbb{F}_{p^m})^r have pairwise distinct entries, and let C=HRSt(α,s)\mathcal{C}=HRS_t(\boldsymbol{\alpha},s) be the corresponding HRS code. Write C^\widehat{\mathcal{C}} for its Schur square. Dimension conjecture. If

r2t2s+1andtmin{p,2s,r},r\geq 2t-2s+1\qquad\text{and}\qquad t\leq\min\{p,2s,r\},

then

dim(C^)=t(t+1)2.\dim(\widehat{\mathcal{C}})=\frac{t(t+1)}{2}.

The conjecture concerns the typical square dimension observed in the paper's data when ptp\geq t and t2st\leq 2s; it complements the established formula (2t2s+1)s(2t-2s+1)s in the regime t2st\geq 2s.

Progress summary

Open

The conjecture remains open: the original paper reports supporting computations and proves important boundary cases, but no proof or counterexample has been publicly verified.

Gu, Zhu, and Zhang’s 2026 preprint conjectures that the Schur-square dimension is t(t+1)/2t(t+1)/2 whenever r2t2s+1r\geq 2t-2s+1 and tmin{p,2s,r}t\leq\min\{p,2s,r\}. It is presented as a conjecture based on computational data, not as a theorem.

Known results

  • For s2s\geq2, 2strs12s\leq t\leq rs-1, and p2sp\geq2s, the paper proves (2t3s+2)sdim(C^)(2t2s+1)s(2t-3s+2)s\leq\dim(\widehat{\mathcal C})\leq(2t-2s+1)s.
  • Under the same hypotheses with ptp\geq t, it proves dim(C^)=(2t2s+1)s\dim(\widehat{\mathcal C})=(2t-2s+1)s.
  • Consequently, when pt=2sp\geq t=2s, the conjectured value t(t+1)/2t(t+1)/2 is established.

April 2026 preprint

The authors explicitly leave the general-parameter dimension analysis as future work. No publicly retrieved source supplies a corroborated proof, counterexample, verification, or refutation of Conjecture 3.5.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture is open; the boundary case t=2st=2s under ptp\geq t and the stated partial bounds are settled, while the full range remains unproved.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Haojie Gu, Zhihao Zhu and Jun Zhang, “The dimensions of Schur squares of HRS codes”, arXiv:2604.17864 (2026).

Solutions 1

Proof

Complete proof of Conjecture 3.5 for all stipulated parameters.

In fact, the conclusion holds over every field KK of characteristic zero or characteristic ptp\ge t. Suppose that α1,,αrK\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_r\in K are pairwise distinct and that

tr,t2s,r2t2s+1.t\le r,\qquad t\le 2s,\qquad r\ge 2t-2s+1.

For 0i<t0\le i<t, let gig_i denote the HRS evaluation vector of XiX^i. Its coordinate in derivative block jj at the evaluation point αv\alpha_v is

gi(j,v)=(ij)αvij.g_i(j,v)=\binom{i}{j}\alpha_v^{\,i-j}.

Consequently the Schur products Ri,k=gigkR_{i,k}=g_i\star g_k, indexed by 0ik<t0\le i\le k<t, have coordinates

Ri,k(j,v)=(ij)(kj)αvi+k2j.(1)R_{i,k}(j,v) =\binom{i}{j}\binom{k}{j}\alpha_v^{\,i+k-2j}. \tag{1}

Interpolation functionals. Set

Φ(X)=v=1r(Xαv).\Phi(X)=\prod_{v=1}^{r}(X-\alpha_v).

For 0j<s0\le j<s and 0e<r0\le e<r, let Lj,eL_{j,e} interpolate the rr entries in derivative block jj by their unique polynomial of degree less than rr, then extract its XeX^e-coefficient. Thus, for every polynomial PP,

Lj,e ⁣((P(αv))v=1r)=[Xe](PmodΦ).(2)L_{j,e}\!\left((P(\alpha_v))_{v=1}^{r}\right) =[X^e](P\bmod\Phi). \tag{2}

For each total degree h{0,,2t2}h\in\{0,\ldots,2t-2\}, define

Ih=max{0,ht+1},ch=h2Ih+1,ah=max{0,hr+12}.(3)\begin{aligned} I_h&=\max\{0,h-t+1\},\\ c_h&=\left\lfloor\frac h2\right\rfloor-I_h+1,\\ a_h&=\max\left\{0,\left\lceil\frac{h-r+1}{2}\right\rceil\right\}. \end{aligned} \tag{3}

Exactly chc_h product vectors have total degree hh, namely

(i,k)=(Ih+,hIh),0<ch.(4)(i,k)=(I_h+\ell,h-I_h-\ell), \qquad 0\le\ell<c_h. \tag{4}

Pair these vectors with the chc_h functionals

Lj,h2j,ahj<ah+ch.(5)L_{j,h-2j}, \qquad a_h\le j<a_h+c_h. \tag{5}

All these indices are valid. Indeed, ahIha_h\le I_h and 0h2j<r0\le h-2j<r. If ah=0a_h=0, then

cht2s.c_h\le\left\lceil\frac t2\right\rceil\le s.

If ah>0a_h>0, the hypothesis r2t2s+1r\ge 2t-2s+1 gives

ahst+h2,ch=th2,a_h\le s-t+\left\lceil\frac h2\right\rceil, \qquad c_h=t-\left\lceil\frac h2\right\rceil,

and hence ah+chsa_h+c_h\le s.

Block-triangularity. A product vector of smaller total degree h<hh'<h has, in derivative block jj, either the zero polynomial or a polynomial of degree

h2j<h2j<r.h'-2j<h-2j<r.

The corresponding functional Lj,h2jL_{j,h-2j} therefore annihilates it. Ordering both product vectors and functionals by total degree makes their square pairing matrix block triangular. Its diagonal block of degree hh is

Dh=[(Ih+ah+u)(hIhah+u)]0,u<ch.(6)D_h= \left[ \binom{I_h+\ell}{a_h+u} \binom{h-I_h-\ell}{a_h+u} \right]_{0\le\ell,u<c_h}. \tag{6}

For h=0h=0, this is the invertible block [1][1]. For h>0h>0, put I=IhI=I_h, a=aha=a_h, and c=chc=c_h. The previously established determinant formula in Lemma 2.5 of Gu, Zhu, and Zhang, applied to M(a,a+c1,I,hI)M(a,a+c-1,I,h-I), gives

detDh==0c1(I+a)(hIa)(a+)2w=0c2u=1c1w(h2I+1w2u)(c1w)!.(7)\det D_h = \prod_{\ell=0}^{c-1} \frac{ \binom{I+\ell}{a}\binom{h-I-\ell}{a} }{ \binom{a+\ell}{\ell}^{2} } \prod_{w=0}^{c-2} \frac{ \displaystyle\prod_{u=1}^{c-1-w}(h-2I+1-w-2u) }{ (c-1-w)! }. \tag{7}

Every upper binomial argument and every factorial argument is less than tt. Every remaining linear factor belongs to {1,,t1}\{1,\ldots,t-1\}: if h<th<t, its minimum is 11 or 22 and its maximum is h1<th-1<t; if hth\ge t, its minimum is

2h2h+1{1,2},2\left\lceil\frac h2\right\rceil-h+1\in\{1,2\},

and its maximum is 2th3<t2t-h-3<t. Thus detDh0\det D_h\ne0 in characteristic zero and in every characteristic ptp\ge t.

Every diagonal block is therefore invertible. Since

h=02t2ch=#{(i,k):0ik<t}=(t+12),\sum_{h=0}^{2t-2}c_h =\#\{(i,k):0\le i\le k<t\} =\binom{t+1}{2},

all Schur products are linearly independent. Consequently,

dimK ⁣(HRSt(α,s)2)=(t+12)=t(t+1)2.\boxed{ \dim_K\!\left( \operatorname{HRS}_t(\boldsymbol\alpha,s)^{\star 2} \right) =\binom{t+1}{2} =\frac{t(t+1)}2. }

This proves the full conjecture for every permitted finite field and every choice of distinct evaluation points, with no generic-position assumption.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel · · edited