The all-α extension of the super-4 theorem

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let calpha>2calpha>2 be real, and let cn,kc_{n,k} and the associated quantities be those defined in the paper. All-α conjecture. The statement of Theorem cref{t:super4} holds true for every real number calpha>2calpha>2. The conjecture extends the result established in the paper's preceding special case; the supplied text does not state a resolution.

References

Primary source

Heinz H. Bauschke and Yuan Gao, “Boţ-Nguyen Acceleration, Weighted Mean Ergodic Iteration, and the Beta-Binomial Distribution”, arXiv:2604.17084 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A posted argument claims a complete proof for every real α>2\alpha>2, but no independent verification has been found and the paper itself records only the α=4\alpha=4 case.

The conjecture asks whether the paper’s super-4 theorem extends from its established special case α=4\alpha=4 to every real α>2\alpha>2. Bauschke and Gao state this extension as Conjecture 6.1 in their paper, first posted in April 2026.

Known results

  • Bauschke and Gao (2026): strong convergence is proved for the special case α=4\alpha=4; the all-α\alpha extension is left as a conjecture.

Posted attempt

A reader-written argument claims a complete proof for every real α>2\alpha>2: applying the paper’s shift-operator result is asserted to establish the missing Lorentz condition, after which the convergence theorem would apply. The attempt has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The α=4\alpha=4 case is settled, while a complete all-α\alpha proof has only been claimed publicly and remains unverified.

Sources

Solutions 1

ProofThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

Complete proof for every real α>2\alpha>2, including the Lorentz condition and strong convergence. Let cn,kc_{n,k} be the source's Boţ–Nguyen coefficient array, extended by cn,k=0c_{n,k}=0 outside 0≤k≤n0\le k\le n. Source equation (43e) states

xn+1=∑k=0ncn,kTkx0.x_{n+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}c_{n,k}T^kx_0.

The source's Theorem 4.4 already proves, for every α>2\alpha>2,

cn,k≥0,∑k=0ncn,k=1,cn,k⟶0for each fixed k.c_{n,k}\ge0,\qquad \sum_{k=0}^{n}c_{n,k}=1,\qquad c_{n,k}\longrightarrow0\quad\text{for each fixed }k.

Thus the sole missing hypothesis of its Theorem 2.10 is the Lorentz condition

Ln:=∑k=0∞∣cn,k−cn,k+1∣⟶0.L_n:=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}|c_{n,k}-c_{n,k+1}|\longrightarrow0.

The key is to apply the source's already-established Fact 1.1 to one universal test operator. Work in the real Hilbert space ℓ2(N0)\ell^2(\mathbb N_0), let

Sek=ek+1,Se_k=e_{k+1},

and start the iteration at x0=e0x_0=e_0. The unilateral shift SS is a linear isometry with Fix⁡S={0}\operatorname{Fix}S=\{0\}, so Fact 1.1 applies for every real α>2\alpha>2 and yields

∥xj−Sxj∥2=o(j−1).\|x_j-Sx_j\|_2=o(j^{-1}).

Equation (43e) gives

xn+1=∑k=0ncn,kek,x_{n+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}c_{n,k}e_k,

and consequently

xn+1−Sxn+1=cn,0e0+∑k=1n(cn,k−cn,k−1)ek−cn,nen+1.x_{n+1}-Sx_{n+1} =c_{n,0}e_0 +\sum_{k=1}^{n}(c_{n,k}-c_{n,k-1})e_k -c_{n,n}e_{n+1}.

This vector has at most n+2n+2 nonzero coordinates, and positivity gives the exact identity

∥xn+1−Sxn+1∥1=cn,0+Ln.\|x_{n+1}-Sx_{n+1}\|_1=c_{n,0}+L_n.

Therefore Cauchy–Schwarz and Fact 1.1 imply

0≤Ln≤n+2 ∥xn+1−Sxn+1∥2=o(n−1/2).0\le L_n \le\sqrt{n+2}\,\|x_{n+1}-Sx_{n+1}\|_2 =o(n^{-1/2}).

In particular the Lorentz condition holds for every α>2\alpha>2, with the stronger quantitative bound Ln=o(n−1/2)L_n=o(n^{-1/2}).

All four hypotheses of the source's Theorem 2.10 are now satisfied. Hence, for every real Hilbert space, every linear nonexpansive operator TT, and every starting point x0x_0,

xn+1=∑k=0ncn,kTkx0⟶PFix⁡Tx0in norm.x_{n+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}c_{n,k}T^kx_0 \longrightarrow P_{\operatorname{Fix}T}x_0 \qquad\text{in norm}.

Thus every assertion of Theorem 5.5 extends from α=4\alpha=4 to the entire conjectured range α>2\alpha>2.

Source: Bauschke and Gao, Boţ–Nguyen Acceleration, Weighted Mean Ergodic Iteration, and the Beta-Binomial Distribution, revised August 13, 2026, Fact 1.1, Theorems 2.10 and 4.4, and Conjecture 6.1.