Candidate anharmonic reactive width from the classical normal form

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let KCNF(I,J2,…,Jn)K_{\mathrm{CNF}}(I,J_2,\dots,J_n) be a truncated classical normal form near an index-1 saddle, where II is the reaction integral and JkJ_k are the bath actions. On the normally hyperbolic invariant manifold (NHIM), set I=0I=0. For each bath mode, define

Jkmax⁡(E)=sup⁡{Jk≥0:∃(J2,…,Jn) satisfying KCNF(0,J2,…,Jn)=E}.J_k^{\max}(E)=\sup\left\{J_k\ge0:\exists (J_2,\dots,J_n)\text{ satisfying }K_{\mathrm{CNF}}(0,J_2,\dots,J_n)=E\right\}.

For energies sufficiently close to the saddle, candidate anharmonic reactive width. The transverse reactive width scale should be

ccand(E)=2πmin⁡k≥2Jkmax⁡(E).c_{\mathrm{cand}}(E)=2\pi\min_{k\ge2}J_k^{\max}(E).

This is intended as a candidate width for a bounded full-dimensional neighborhood of the bottleneck, rather than as a proven formula for the exact Gromov width of an arbitrary reactive domain. The claim is suggested by the local normal-form geometry and remains unproved in the stated generality.

References

Primary source

Stephen Wiggins, “Symplectic Constraints in Classical Reaction Dynamics: From Gromov's Camel to Reaction Rates”, arXiv:2604.10408 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.