Logarithmically corrected Edwards–Wilkinson scaling for the directed exclusion process

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let (Ytε)t≥0({\mathcal Y}_t^\varepsilon)_{t\ge 0} be the fluctuation field of the directed exclusion process, with sε(t)s_\varepsilon(t) determined by

t=ε2sε(t)log⁡(sε(t))1/2.t=\varepsilon^{2}s_\varepsilon(t)\log(s_\varepsilon(t))^{1/2}.

The field

Ytε(f)=ε1/2∑x∈Zf(εx−εsε(t))(ηsε(t)(x)−12){\mathcal Y}_t^\varepsilon(f)=\varepsilon^{1/2}\sum_{x\in\mathbb Z}f(\varepsilon x-\varepsilon s_\varepsilon(t))\left(\eta_{s_\varepsilon(t)}(x)-\frac12\right)

for test functions f:R→Rf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R and t≥0t\ge 0 should converge, in the appropriate distributional space, to the infinite-dimensional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process described by the Edwards–Wilkinson equation. The marginally relevant nonlinear term is expected to leave the limiting field unchanged while introducing the logarithmic correction to the time scaling; for fixed t>0t>0, this gives sε(t)∼tε−2∣log⁡ε∣−1/2s_\varepsilon(t)\sim t\varepsilon^{-2}|\log\varepsilon|^{-1/2} as ε→0\varepsilon\to0.

References

Primary source

Ellen Saada, Federico Sau and Assaf Shapira, “Hydrodynamic limit of the directed exclusion process”, arXiv:2604.08154 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.