Demonet's lattice-point conjecture for brick-infinite algebras

Let AA be a finite-dimensional algebra over a field KK. Write K0(projA)K_0(\operatorname{\mathsf{proj}} A) for the Grothendieck group of finitely generated projective AA-modules, and let K0(projA)RK_0(\operatorname{\mathsf{proj}} A)_\mathbb{R} denote its realification. A point in K0(projA)K_0(\operatorname{\mathsf{proj}} A) is a lattice point, and a point θ\theta is called rigid when it has the rigidity property used in the paper. The algebra AA is brick infinite if it has infinitely many isoclasses of bricks. Demonet's conjecture. If AA is brick infinite, then there exists a lattice point

θK0(projA)\theta\in K_0(\operatorname{\mathsf{proj}} A)

which is not rigid. This strengthens the known characterization in which brick infiniteness is equivalent to the existence of a non-rigid point in K0(projA)RK_0(\operatorname{\mathsf{proj}} A)_\mathbb{R}; the integral lattice-point assertion is stated as an open question.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sota Asai, “Bicompact torsion classes and conjectures on brick infinite algebras”, arXiv:2604.04505 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.