Infinite family of congruence conjectures for c(n)
Infinite family of congruence conjectures for c(n)
Let denote the coefficient sequence under consideration, and let . The infinite-family congruence conjecture for .
The authors propose these congruences as a more general infinite family related to the preceding open congruence for . The provided text does not state a proof or resolution.
Progress summary
A 2026 preprint claims to prove all three infinite divisibility patterns, but no independent verification was found.
Banerjee, Bringmann, and El Bachraoui proposed three infinite families of congruences for the coefficient sequence , extending their previously proved initial cases. The conjecture concerns every .
Known results
- Banerjee, Bringmann, and El Bachraoui proved , , and (2026).
2026 claimed proof
Juejie Sun and Olivia X.M. Yao’s preprint claims to settle all three families for , using the earlier results and an identity of Watson; it derives intermediate congruences and an induction. The claim is currently unverified by independent sources, with no reported objection or retraction.
Current status (as of August 2026): The initial cases are established, and Sun–Yao claim a proof of the full families, but independent verification is not recorded.
Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Koustav Banerjee, Kathrin Bringmann and Mohamed El Bachraoui, “On congruence conjectures of Andrews and Bachraoui”, arXiv:2604.02239 (2026).
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Prior proof and attribution. All three conjectured families were already proved by Sun and Yao in arXiv:2604.05403, Section 2. The original problem is therefore not open. The proof below is only an alternative derivation through a stronger residue-three transfer identity; it does not claim the first proof.
All three congruence families hold for every . The key is a transfer theorem between the source's new coefficient sequence and the distinct mock-theta partition function :
where .
Indeed, the primary source gives
and
For , the exact classical four-dissections are
Thus is even and is divisible by . Consequently the residue-two part of satisfies
Therefore contributes zero modulo to every exponent , while
proving the transfer theorem.
Now define
For every , all three integers satisfy . The published theorem of Andrews–Passary–Sellers–Yee gives
and
Applying the transfer identity proves the corresponding three congruences for for every .
When , the three statements reduce to
which are already established as Theorems 1.4–1.6 in the primary source. Hence all three conjectured families hold for every .
The 2017 theorem concerns , not ; Sun and Yao already proved the stated conjecture in arXiv:2604.05403, and the transfer identity gives an alternative stronger route.
Sources: Banerjee–Bringmann–El Bachraoui, arXiv:2604.02239, Conjecture 8.2; Andrews–Passary–Sellers–Yee, The Ramanujan Journal 43 (2017), 347–357, Theorem 1.1, doi:10.1007/s11139-016-9812-2; “On second order mock theta function ,” Electronic Research Archive 30 (2022), 52–65, equations (1.6)–(1.7), doi:10.3934/era.2022003.