The generalized Lindelöf hypothesis for Dirichlet LL-functions

Let χ(modq)\chi\pmod{q} be a Dirichlet character, and write s=σ+its=\sigma+it. Generalized Lindelöf hypothesis. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, if σ1/2\sigma\geq 1/2 and s11/2|s-1|\geq 1/2, then

L(σ+it,χ)ε(q(1+t))ε.L(\sigma+it,\chi)\ll_{\varepsilon}(q(1+|t|))^{\varepsilon}.

This is a standard conjectural bound for Dirichlet LL-functions, extending the critical-line formulation to the half-plane σ1/2\sigma\geq 1/2 away from the pole at s=1s=1. The paper assumes this hypothesis to obtain a near-quadratic conditional bound for the least prime in an arithmetic progression; it remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Matías Bruna, “A conditional bound for the least prime in an arithmetic progression”, arXiv:2603.25612 (2026).

Additional references

6 papers in this index state this conjecture (2024–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:2509.01602, arXiv:2505.02968, arXiv:2405.14834, arXiv:2402.03475, arXiv:2401.05052.

Progress summary

Refreshed
Open

The generalized Lindelöf hypothesis remains unproved: recent work either assumes it or explicitly says its formal calculation is not a proof.

The conjecture gives a nearly minimal uniform growth bound for Dirichlet LL-functions in the half-plane 4σ1/20˘00244\sigma\geq 1/2\u00024. It remains open; no verified proof or counterexample was found.

Recent developments in 2026

  • A March 2026 paper by Matías Bruna proves a near-quadratic bound for the least prime in an arithmetic progression, but only conditional on the generalized Lindelöf hypothesis; it does not advance the conjecture itself.
  • The preprint An approach to the Lindelöf Hypothesis for Dirichlet LL-functions presents a formal calculation suggesting the critical-line estimate, but explicitly says convergence and rearrangement of sums are unjustified and derives an incorrect identity; it is not a proof.

Current status (as of August 2026): The generalized Lindelöf hypothesis for Dirichlet LL-functions remains open, with no verified proof, counterexample, or substantive progress recorded in the retrieved sources.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.