The conjectured consistency probability formula for cycles

From papers

Let CnC_n be the cycle with nn edges, and let q(Cn)q(C_n) denote its consistency probability. Define

s=17+9732,t=179732.s=\frac{17+\sqrt{97}}{32},\qquad t=\frac{17-\sqrt{97}}{32}.

The cycle consistency probability conjecture. The consistency probability of CnC_n is

q(Cn)=sn+tn14n18n1.q(C_n)=s^n+t^n-\frac{1}{4^n}-\frac{1}{8^{n-1}}.

This formula is proposed in the source without a supplied resolution or supporting context, so its status remains open.

Progress summary

Open

No verified proof or disproof of the proposed cycle formula was found; a related March 2026 preprint may be relevant but does not establish a resolution.

The problem asks whether the stated closed formula for the consistency probability of cycles is correct. No proposer, date, proof, counterexample, or independent verification was identified in the retrieved material.

March 2026 related preprint

P. Horak and I. Semaev announced a preprint titled “Inconsistency Probability of Sparse Equations over F2\mathbb{F}_2.” Its retrieved announcement does not show that it proves or refutes this exact cycle formula, so it is not evidence of progress on the conjecture.

Current status (as of August 2026): The cycle formula remains unproved and undisproved on the retrieved evidence; the related March 2026 preprint has not been shown to resolve it.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

P. Horak and I. Semaev, “Inconsistency Probability of Sparse Equations over F2”, arXiv:2603.24890 (2026).

Solutions 1

Counterexample

The conjectured formula is false for every cycle length n3n\ge3. Its exact corrected version is

q(Cn)=sn+tn14n128n,s=17+9732,t=179732.\boxed{ q(C_n) = s^n+t^n-\frac1{4^n}-\frac1{2\cdot8^n}, \qquad s=\frac{17+\sqrt{97}}{32}, \quad t=\frac{17-\sqrt{97}}{32}. }

The published final term 81n-8^{1-n} is incorrect, and the discrepancy is

q(Cn)qconjectured(Cn)=1528n>0.q(C_n)-q_{\mathrm{conjectured}}(C_n) = \frac{15}{2\cdot8^n}>0.

In particular, although the source reports agreement for n=3,,7n=3,\ldots,7, exhaustive exact enumeration at n=3n=3 gives

q(C3)=23974096,q(C_3)=\frac{2397}{4096},

whereas the stated conjecture gives 2337/40962337/4096.

Here is a finite-state proof of the corrected formula for every nn. Each uniformly random Boolean equation on an edge determines a uniformly random binary relation R{0,1}2R\subseteq\{0,1\}^2. There are 16 equally likely relations, viewed as 2×22\times2 Boolean matrices. Their composition is

(RS)ij=a=01(RiaSaj).(R\circ S)_{ij} = \bigvee_{a=0}^{1}(R_{ia}\wedge S_{aj}).

An assignment around the cycle exists if and only if the product R1RnR_1\circ\cdots\circ R_n has a nonzero diagonal entry.

Discard the absorbing zero relation. The other relations have six classes under independent row and column permutations: one entry, one full row, one full column, a permutation matrix, three entries, and four entries. Their respective class sizes are

d=(4,2,2,2,4,1),d=(4,2,2,2,4,1),

and the proportions having a nonzero diagonal entry are

g=(12,1,1,12,1,1)T.g=\left(\frac12,1,1,\frac12,1,1\right)^{\mathsf T}.

Counting right multiplication by each of the 16 relations gives the exact class-transition matrix

L=(840000690000008004422241214044006009).L= \begin{pmatrix} 8&4&0&0&0&0\\ 6&9&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&8&0&0&4\\ 4&2&2&2&4&1\\ 2&1&4&0&4&4\\ 0&0&6&0&0&9 \end{pmatrix}.

Thus the number of consistent edge systems is

An=dLn1g.A_n=dL^{n-1}g.

For

P(X)=(X2)(X4)(X217X+48),P(X) = (X-2)(X-4)(X^2-17X+48),

direct integer multiplication gives

P(L)(2g)=0.P(L)(2g)=0.

Consequently

An+4=23An+3158An+2+424An+1384An.A_{n+4} = 23A_{n+3}-158A_{n+2} +424A_{n+1}-384A_n.

The initial values are

A1=12,A2=175,A3=2397,A4=32377.A_1=12,\quad A_2=175,\quad A_3=2397,\quad A_4=32377.

Writing λ±=(17±97)/2\lambda_\pm=(17\pm\sqrt{97})/2, these initial values and the recurrence give

An=λ+n+λn4n2n1(n1).A_n = \lambda_+^n+\lambda_-^n-4^n-2^{n-1} \qquad(n\ge1).

Division by 16n16^n proves the corrected probability formula for every simple cycle n3n\ge3.

Source: P. Horak and I. Semaev, “Inconsistency Probability of Sparse Equations over F2\mathbb F_2,” arXiv:2603.24890, Conjecture 20.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·