The conjectured consistency probability formula for cycles

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let CnC_n be the cycle with nn edges, and let q(Cn)q(C_n) denote its consistency probability. Define

s=17+9732,t=17−9732.s=\frac{17+\sqrt{97}}{32},\qquad t=\frac{17-\sqrt{97}}{32}.

The cycle consistency probability conjecture. The consistency probability of CnC_n is

q(Cn)=sn+tn−14n−18n−1.q(C_n)=s^n+t^n-\frac{1}{4^n}-\frac{1}{8^{n-1}}.

This formula is proposed in the source without a supplied resolution or supporting context, so its status remains open.

References

Primary source

P. Horak and I. Semaev, “Inconsistency Probability of Sparse Equations over F2”, arXiv:2603.24890 (2026).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

A purported exact disproof says the proposed cycle formula has a wrong final term and supplies a replacement formula, but this has not been independently verified.

Horak and Semaev proposed the cycle consistency-probability formula in their 2026 paper on sparse equations over F2\mathbb{F}_2. The paper records it as a conjecture, without a resolution in the retrieved primary source.

Posted attempt

A complete unverified attempt claims the conjecture is false for every n≥3n\ge3, gives the discrepancy 15/(2⋅8n)15/(2\cdot8^n), and proposes the corrected formula with final term −1/(2⋅8n)-1/(2\cdot8^n). It reports exact enumeration at n=3n=3 and a finite-state transition-matrix recurrence proving the correction for all simple cycles; the attempt has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The original formula is unproved and is challenged by an unverified claimed disproof; the proposed corrected formula remains unconfirmed.

Sources

Solutions 1

CounterexampleThis solution needs a summarySee full solutionHide full solution

The conjectured formula is false for every cycle length n≥3n\ge3. Its exact corrected version is

q(Cn)=sn+tn−14n−12⋅8n,s=17+9732,t=17−9732.\boxed{ q(C_n) = s^n+t^n-\frac1{4^n}-\frac1{2\cdot8^n}, \qquad s=\frac{17+\sqrt{97}}{32}, \quad t=\frac{17-\sqrt{97}}{32}. }

The published final term −81−n-8^{1-n} is incorrect, and the discrepancy is

q(Cn)−qconjectured(Cn)=152⋅8n>0.q(C_n)-q_{\mathrm{conjectured}}(C_n) = \frac{15}{2\cdot8^n}>0.

In particular, although the source reports agreement for n=3,…,7n=3,\ldots,7, exhaustive exact enumeration at n=3n=3 gives

q(C3)=23974096,q(C_3)=\frac{2397}{4096},

whereas the stated conjecture gives 2337/40962337/4096.

Here is a finite-state proof of the corrected formula for every nn. Each uniformly random Boolean equation on an edge determines a uniformly random binary relation R⊆{0,1}2R\subseteq\{0,1\}^2. There are 16 equally likely relations, viewed as 2×22\times2 Boolean matrices. Their composition is

(R∘S)ij=⋁a=01(Ria∧Saj).(R\circ S)_{ij} = \bigvee_{a=0}^{1}(R_{ia}\wedge S_{aj}).

An assignment around the cycle exists if and only if the product R1∘⋯∘RnR_1\circ\cdots\circ R_n has a nonzero diagonal entry.

Discard the absorbing zero relation. The other relations have six classes under independent row and column permutations: one entry, one full row, one full column, a permutation matrix, three entries, and four entries. Their respective class sizes are

d=(4,2,2,2,4,1),d=(4,2,2,2,4,1),

and the proportions having a nonzero diagonal entry are

g=(12,1,1,12,1,1)T.g=\left(\frac12,1,1,\frac12,1,1\right)^{\mathsf T}.

Counting right multiplication by each of the 16 relations gives the exact class-transition matrix

L=(840000690000008004422241214044006009).L= \begin{pmatrix} 8&4&0&0&0&0\\ 6&9&0&0&0&0\\ 0&0&8&0&0&4\\ 4&2&2&2&4&1\\ 2&1&4&0&4&4\\ 0&0&6&0&0&9 \end{pmatrix}.

Thus the number of consistent edge systems is

An=dLn−1g.A_n=dL^{n-1}g.

For

P(X)=(X−2)(X−4)(X2−17X+48),P(X) = (X-2)(X-4)(X^2-17X+48),

direct integer multiplication gives

P(L)(2g)=0.P(L)(2g)=0.

Consequently

An+4=23An+3−158An+2+424An+1−384An.A_{n+4} = 23A_{n+3}-158A_{n+2} +424A_{n+1}-384A_n.

The initial values are

A1=12,A2=175,A3=2397,A4=32377.A_1=12,\quad A_2=175,\quad A_3=2397,\quad A_4=32377.

Writing λ±=(17±97)/2\lambda_\pm=(17\pm\sqrt{97})/2, these initial values and the recurrence give

An=λ+n+λ−n−4n−2n−1(n≥1).A_n = \lambda_+^n+\lambda_-^n-4^n-2^{n-1} \qquad(n\ge1).

Division by 16n16^n proves the corrected probability formula for every simple cycle n≥3n\ge3.

Source: P. Horak and I. Semaev, “Inconsistency Probability of Sparse Equations over F2\mathbb F_2,” arXiv:2603.24890, Conjecture 20.