Higher-degree denominator conjecture for membrane indices on O(1)O(3)\mathcal{O}(-1)\oplus\mathcal{O}(3) over P2\mathbb{P}^2

Let q0,q1,q2\overline{q}_0,\overline{q}_1,\overline{q}_2 be the equivariant variables in the example of the local Calabi–Yau fivefold over P2\mathbb{P}^2, let [H][H] denote the hyperplane class, and let Ωd[H]\Omega_{d[H]} be the corresponding membrane index. For an integer nn, write od(n)\operatorname{od}(n) for its odd part, and let [m]qi[m]_{\overline{q}_i} denote the quantum-number notation used for the equivariant variable qi\overline{q}_i.

Higher-degree denominator conjecture. For every integer d>1d>1,

(i=02n=1d1[2n]qi[od(n)]qi)Ωd[H]Z[e1±1,e2,e3].\left(\prod_{i=0}^2 \prod_{n=1}^{d-1}\frac{[2n]_{\overline{q}_i}}{[\operatorname{od}(n)]_{\overline{q}_i}}\right)\cdot \Omega_{d[H]} \in \mathbb{Z}[e_1^{\pm 1},e_2,e_3].

The claim predicts that, after multiplying by the displayed factors, higher-degree membrane indices have integral coefficients. It is motivated by numerical data and the observation that powers of 22 are the worst denominators in the non-skeletal limit; the source gives no proof or resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Yannik Schuler, “Gromov-Witten invariants and membrane indices of fivefolds via the topological vertex”, arXiv:2603.24256 (2026).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2013–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1310.7904.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.