The information-rate bound for fiber-57 returns in Collatz orbits

Let (n0,n1,)(n_0,n_1,\ldots) be a Collatz orbit with n0>1n_0>1. Let τ1<τ2<\tau_1<\tau_2<\cdots be successive fiber-5757 return times, set qj=nτj/64q_j=\lfloor n_{\tau_j}/64\rfloor, and let IrI_r be the invariant core modulo 8r8^r. Define the raw inter-chain return fraction

R^r(n0)=lim supN#{1jN:qjmod8rIr, j inter-chain}#{1jN:j inter-chain},\widehat R_r(n_0)=\limsup_{N\to\infty}\frac{\#\{1\le j\le N:q_j\bmod8^r\in I_r,\ j\text{ inter-chain}\}}{\#\{1\le j\le N:j\text{ inter-chain}\}},

and the normalised ratio

Rr(n0)=R^r(n0)Ir/8r.R_r(n_0)=\frac{\widehat R_r(n_0)}{|I_r|/8^r}.

Thus Rr=1R_r=1 is the baseline density and Rr<1R_r<1 means under-visitation of IrI_r. Define the per-return memory supply by c(n0)=log2Rr(n0)c'(n_0)=-\log_2R_r(n_0). Information-rate bound. For every n0>1n_0>1 and every r2r\ge2 at which absorption holds,

c(n0)<c0=log2 ⁣(1024129)2.989.c'(n_0)<c_0=\log_2\!\left(\frac{1024}{129}\right)\approx2.989.

The main reduction theorem states that this orbitwise bound would imply the Collatz conjecture. The statement is explicitly the sole unresolved dynamical input in the paper, and the numerical constant is based only on the known-gap partial kernel; including unresolved larger gaps would make the bound harder to satisfy.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Edward Y. Chang, “Exploring Collatz Dynamics with Human-LLM Collaboration”, arXiv:2603.11066 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.