Cao–Maulik–Toda DT–GV correspondence for Calabi–Yau fourfolds

About 8 years old · traced to

Let YY be a Calabi–Yau 44-fold, let β∈H2(Y,Z)\beta\in H_2(Y,\mathbb{Z}) be a curve class, and let Mβ(Y)\mathbf{M}_{\beta}(Y) be the moduli space of one-dimensional stable sheaves FF on YY satisfying [F]=β[F]=\beta and χ(F)=1\chi(F)=1. For γ∈H4−2i(Y,Z)\gamma\in H^{4-2i}(Y,\mathbb{Z}), define the insertion

τi(γ)=πM∗(πY∗γ∪ch⁡i+3(F)),\tau_i(\gamma)=\pi_{\mathbf{M}*}\left(\pi_Y^*\gamma\cup\operatorname{ch}_{i+3}(\mathcal{F})\right),

where F\mathcal{F} is the universal sheaf with trivial determinant, and write ⟨τi(γ)⟩β\langle\tau_i(\gamma)\rangle_\beta for its integral over the virtual class [Mβ(Y)]vir[\mathbf{M}_\beta(Y)]^{\mathrm{vir}}. Let n0,β(−)n_{0,\beta}(-) and n1,βn_{1,\beta} denote the genus-zero and genus-one GV-type invariants, respectively, and let mβ1,β2m_{\beta_1,\beta_2} denote the meeting invariants. Under a suitable orientation on Mβ(Y)\mathbf{M}_\beta(Y), Cao–Maulik–Toda's conjecture.

(a) For γ0∈H4(Y,Z)\gamma_0\in H^4(Y,\mathbb{Z}),

n0,β(γ0)=⟨τ0(γ0)⟩β.n_{0,\beta}(\gamma_0)=\langle\tau_0(\gamma_0)\rangle_\beta.

(b) For γ1∈H2(Y,Z)\gamma_1\in H^2(Y,\mathbb{Z}),

⟨τ1(γ1)⟩β=n0,β(γ12)2(γ1⋅β)−∑β1+β2=β(γ1⋅β1)(γ1⋅β2)4(γ1⋅β)mβ1,β2−∑k≥1,,k∣βγ1⋅βkn1,β/k.\langle \tau_1(\gamma_1)\rangle_\beta = \frac{n_{0,\beta}(\gamma_1^2)}{2(\gamma_1\cdot\beta)} - \sum_{\beta_1+\beta_2=\beta} \frac{(\gamma_1\cdot\beta_1)(\gamma_1\cdot\beta_2)}{4(\gamma_1\cdot\beta)}m_{\beta_1,\beta_2} - \sum_{k\geq 1,\\,k|\beta} \frac{\gamma_1\cdot\beta}{k}n_{1,\beta/k}.

These identities express the predicted correspondence between DT invariants and GV-type invariants for Calabi–Yau fourfolds, including the genus-one and meeting-invariant contributions. The paper reports that its computations for the local Calabi–Yau fourfold over the Mukai–Umemura variety verify these predictions assuming vanishing of the genus-one GV-type invariants; the general conjecture remains unresolved.

References

Primary source

Kiryong Chung and Joonyeong Won, “DT-GV correspondence on the Mukai-Umemura variety”, arXiv:2603.05823 (2026).

Additional references

4 papers in this index state this conjecture (2018–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1903.12171, arXiv:1902.00003, arXiv:1801.06130.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.