Conjecture on dyadic congruences for overcolored partition functions

Less than 1 year old · traced to

Let aˉr,s(n)\bar{a}_{r,s}(n) denote the overcolored partition function with parameters rr and ss. For integers k≥1k\geq 1 and j,i≥0j,i\geq 0, consider the parameter pair

r=2k+1j+2k−1,s=2ki+1.r=2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,\qquad s=2^ki+1.

Dyadic congruence conjecture. For every integer n≥0n\geq 0, the congruences

aˉ2k+1j+2k−1,2ki+1(3n+2)≡0(mod2k+1),\bar{a}_{2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,2^ki+1}(3n+2)\equiv 0 \pmod {2^{k+1}}, aˉ2k+1j+2k−1,2ki+1(9n+3)≡0(mod2k+2),\bar{a}_{2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,2^ki+1}(9n+3)\equiv 0 \pmod {2^{k+2}}, aˉ2k+1j+2k−1,2ki+1(9n+6)≡0(mod2k+2).\bar{a}_{2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,2^ki+1}(9n+6)\equiv 0 \pmod {2^{k+2}}.

These congruences extend the paper's arithmetic investigations of the overcolored partition function; the concluding remark specifically calls for an elementary proof of the congruences in this conjecture, and no resolution is supplied in the given text.

References

Primary source

M. P. Thejitha and S. N. Fathima, “Overcolored Partition Restricted by Parity of the Parts”, arXiv:2603.01669 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.