Conjecture on dyadic congruences for overcolored partition functions

From papers

Let aˉr,s(n)\bar{a}_{r,s}(n) denote the overcolored partition function with parameters rr and ss. For integers k1k\geq 1 and j,i0j,i\geq 0, consider the parameter pair

r=2k+1j+2k1,s=2ki+1.r=2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,\qquad s=2^ki+1.

Dyadic congruence conjecture. For every integer n0n\geq 0, the congruences

aˉ2k+1j+2k1,2ki+1(3n+2)0(mod2k+1),\bar{a}_{2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,2^ki+1}(3n+2)\equiv 0 \pmod {2^{k+1}}, aˉ2k+1j+2k1,2ki+1(9n+3)0(mod2k+2),\bar{a}_{2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,2^ki+1}(9n+3)\equiv 0 \pmod {2^{k+2}}, aˉ2k+1j+2k1,2ki+1(9n+6)0(mod2k+2).\bar{a}_{2^{k+1}j+2^k-1,2^ki+1}(9n+6)\equiv 0 \pmod {2^{k+2}}.

These congruences extend the paper's arithmetic investigations of the overcolored partition function; the concluding remark specifically calls for an elementary proof of the congruences in this conjecture, and no resolution is supplied in the given text.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

M. P. Thejitha and S. N. Fathima, “Overcolored Partition Restricted by Parity of the Parts”, arXiv:2603.01669 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.