The leading-block and eigenvalue conjecture for E0_2-matrices

Let ARn×nZA\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}\cap\mathbf{Z} be an E02\mathbf{E_{0_2}}-matrix. Write A1A^{-1} in block form using an index set α\alpha and its complement αˉ\bar{\alpha}, and let A/AααA/A_{\alpha\alpha} denote the Schur complement of AααA_{\alpha\alpha} in AA. The leading principal diagonal block is

Aαα1+Aαα1Aααˉ(A/Aαα)1AαˉαAαα1.A_{\alpha\alpha}^{-1}+A_{\alpha\alpha}^{-1}A_{\alpha\bar{\alpha}}(A/A_{\alpha\alpha})^{-1}A_{\bar{\alpha}\alpha}A_{\alpha\alpha}^{-1}.

Leading-block and eigenvalue conjecture. This leading principal diagonal block of A1A^{-1} is a Z\mathbf{Z}-matrix. Moreover, AA has exactly one negative eigenvalue.

The claim concerns structural properties of inverses and spectra within the class of E02\mathbf{E_{0_2}}-matrices. The supplied text presents it as a conjecture motivated by examples and previous observations; no resolution is given.

Progress summary

Solved

A reader-posted complete proof claims the conjecture is solved, but no independent verification has been found and a 2026 paper does not settle it.

The conjecture asserts that a specified leading principal block of A1A^{-1} is a Z\mathbf{Z}-matrix and that every E02\mathbf{E}_{0_2}-matrix AA has exactly one negative eigenvalue. Its proposer and date are not identified in the retrieved material.

February 2026 paper

Chauhan and Dubey introduce semimonotone matrices of exact order 22, characterize the 3×33\times3 case, and prove that every n×nn\times n semimonotone Z\mathbf{Z}-matrix of exact order 22 is invertible; the abstract does not claim the conjecture.

Posted attempt

An unverified complete-proof attempt claims stronger results: every off-diagonal entry of A1A^{-1} is nonpositive, using principal-minor signs, and Descartes' rule then yields exactly one negative eigenvalue. The attempt has not been independently verified.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjecture has an unverified complete-proof claim, but no corroborated proof or resolution is recorded; absent verification, it remains open.

Sources
Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Bharat Pratap Chauhan and Dipti Dubey, “On semimonotone matrices of exact order two”, arXiv:2603.00639 (2026).

Solutions 1

Proof

In fact, the ENTIRE inverse is a Z\mathbf Z-matrix, which strengthens the assertion concerning only its leading principal block.

Let AZE02A\in\mathbf Z\cap\mathbf E_{0_2}. Theorem 3.9 gives

detA[S,S]0(Sn2),\det A[S,S]\ge0 \quad (|S|\le n-2), detA[S,S]<0(S=n1),detA<0.\det A[S,S]<0 \quad (|S|=n-1), \qquad \det A<0.

Set detA[,]=1\det A[\varnothing,\varnothing]=1.

For distinct indices i,ji,j, expand the off-diagonal cofactor according to its simple directed ii-to-jj path:

adj(A)ij=P:ij(1)(P)((u,v)Pauv)detA[VV(P),VV(P)].\operatorname{adj}(A)_{ij} = \sum_{P:i\rightsquigarrow j} (-1)^{\ell(P)} \left(\prod_{(u,v)\in P}a_{uv}\right) \det A[V\setminus V(P),V\setminus V(P)].

Indeed, each term in the cofactor permutation expansion decomposes uniquely into its directed ii-to-jj path and a permutation on the complementary vertices.

Because AA is a Z\mathbf Z-matrix, every off-diagonal edge weight satisfies auv0a_{uv}\le0. Consequently

(1)(P)(u,v)Pauv0.(-1)^{\ell(P)}\prod_{(u,v)\in P}a_{uv}\ge0.

Every such path contains at least two vertices, so its complementary principal minor has order at most n2n-2 and is nonnegative. Every term in the path expansion is therefore nonnegative:

adj(A)ij0(ij).\operatorname{adj}(A)_{ij}\ge0\qquad(i\ne j).

Since detA<0\det A<0,

(A1)ij=adj(A)ijdetA0(ij).(A^{-1})_{ij} =\frac{\operatorname{adj}(A)_{ij}}{\det A}\le0 \qquad(i\ne j).

Thus A1A^{-1} itself is a Z\mathbf Z-matrix, and hence so is each of its principal diagonal blocks, including the specified leading block.

For the eigenvalue assertion, write

det(tI+A)=tn+c1tn1++cn2t2+cn1t+cn,ck=S=kdetA[S,S].\det(tI+A) =t^n+c_1t^{n-1}+\cdots+c_{n-2}t^2+c_{n-1}t+c_n, \qquad c_k=\sum_{|S|=k}\det A[S,S].

The established principal-minor signs imply

ck0(1kn2),cn1<0,cn<0.c_k\ge0\quad(1\le k\le n-2),\qquad c_{n-1}<0,\qquad c_n<0.

After zero coefficients are omitted, this coefficient sequence has exactly one sign change. Descartes' rule of signs therefore gives exactly one positive real root of det(tI+A)\det(tI+A), counted with multiplicity. Equivalently, AA has exactly one negative real eigenvalue. Both conjectured assertions follow.

0 endorsements
Shivam Patel ·