The upper bound conjecture for wavefront sets of representations

Let HH be a split classical group over FF, let u u denote the nilpotent orbit of the image of

(0100)\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix}

under the derivative of the relevant SL2(C)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})-factor, and let dH(Ad(H)ν)d_{H^\vee}(\operatorname{Ad}(H^\vee)\nu) denote the corresponding dual nilpotent orbit. For ϕΦ(H(F))\phi\in\Phi(H(F)), write ϕ^\widehat\phi for the parameter obtained from the second SL2(C)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})-factor and Nϕ^N_{\widehat\phi} for its associated nilpotent element. The upper bound conjecture. For any πΠϕ\pi\in\Pi_\phi, if oHstNˉ(π^)\mathfrak{o}_H^\mathrm{st}\in\bar{\mathcal{N}}(\hat\pi), then

oHstdH(Ad(H)Nϕ^).\mathfrak{o}_H^\mathrm{st}\leq d_{H^\vee}(\operatorname{Ad}(H^\vee)N_{\widehat\phi}).

Moreover, if ϕ\phi is tempered, then

Nˉ(π^)max={dH(Ad(H)Nϕ^)}\bar{\mathcal{N}}(\hat\pi)^{\max}=\{d_{H^\vee}(\operatorname{Ad}(H^\vee)N_{\widehat\phi})\}

for some πΠϕ\pi\in\Pi_\phi. This conjecture concerns the wavefront upper bound predicted by the local Langlands correspondence. It is known for general linear groups, depth-zero simple supercuspidal representations of classical groups, certain unipotent representations with real infinitesimal character, and the exceptional group G2G_2; the general case remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Hiraku Atobe and Dan Ciubotaru, “Endoscopic transfer and the wavefront upper bound conjecture”, arXiv:2602.22504 (2026).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.