ChatGPT 5.2's local smoothability conjecture for valence-4 polyhedral Lagrangian vertices

From papers

Let KK be an orientable polyhedral Lagrangian in (R4,ω)(\mathbb{R}^4,\omega), let vv be a valence-44 vertex, and let Γv,δ(S3,ξstd)\Gamma_{v,\delta}\subset (S^3,\xi_{\mathrm{std}}) be the Legendrian link obtained by intersecting a locally smoothed neighborhood of vv with a sufficiently small sphere. Let μ(K,v)\mu(K,v) denote the polyhedral Maslov index at vv, and write Γvε\Gamma_v^\varepsilon for the corresponding smoothed link. ChatGPT 5.2's conjecture. If

μ(K,v)=0,\mu(K,v)=0,

then

rot(Γvε)=0andtb(Γvε)=1,\operatorname{rot}(\Gamma_v^\varepsilon)=0\quad\text{and}\quad tb(\Gamma_v^\varepsilon)=-1,

and consequently Γvε\Gamma_v^\varepsilon is Legendrian isotopic to the standard Legendrian unknot. If

μ(K,v)0,\mu(K,v)\neq 0,

then

rot(Γvε)0,\operatorname{rot}(\Gamma_v^\varepsilon)\neq 0,

and Γvε\Gamma_v^\varepsilon cannot bound a Lagrangian disk inside Bε(v)B_\varepsilon(v); in particular, the vertex is not locally Lagrangian smoothable. This claim is presented as the proposed final step in the local smoothing argument for polyhedral Lagrangians. The surrounding text identifies the vanishing Maslov index as the known obstruction to rotation number and proposes the Thurston--Bennequin computation as the remaining obstruction; no proof or independent resolution of the stated two-part claim is supplied in the source.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Antonio Alfieri and Connor Novak, “Research Report: some constructions in Polyhedral Symplectic Topology suggested by AI”, arXiv:2602.13519 (2026).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.