Integrality and leading-coefficient conjecture for colored-triangle coefficient polynomials
Integrality and leading-coefficient conjecture for colored-triangle coefficient polynomials
For each fixed , let be the coefficient of in , regarded as a polynomial in as in the polynomiality conjecture. Integrality and leading-coefficient conjecture. The polynomial has integer coefficients, and its leading coefficient is .
The claim is motivated by the observed formulas for the first coefficients and by a local-defect enumeration argument for the leading term. The source does not provide a proof for all , so the conjecture remains open.
Progress summary
No verified public progress appears to have been made on this conjecture.
No public discussion or published progress was found; the conjecture therefore remains open.
Current status (as of August 2026): The integrality and leading-coefficient assertions remain unproved, with no verified counterexample or claimed resolution found.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Natasha Blitvic and Leonid Petrov, “Colored interlacing triangles and Genocchi medians”, arXiv:2602.04390 (2026).
Additional references
2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2017–2026). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:1708.07998.
Solutions 1
Sign in to submit a solution.
Proof for every coefficient order. Write
We prove that, for every , the eventual polynomial belongs to and has leading coefficient .
Quotient the depth-two triangles by the independent energy-preserving interface involutions of source Corollary 2.3 and Proposition 3.4(iii). The normalized polynomial then counts canonical orbit representatives. Every such representative decomposes uniquely into its ordered direct-sum-irreducible blocks, and the energy is additive across blocks. Hence
where counts nonempty irreducible canonical triangles.
We first establish that each fixed-energy part of is a genuine polynomial in . Let be the -th bottom color, and let be the active color set immediately before it. Interlacing gives and . Define
The displacement identity and the active-set bound give
and
Whenever , the first bottom colors are exactly , the adjacent active sets are and , and the canonical interface separates the two ordered direct-sum blocks. Thus every noncut is either counted by some positive , or is adjacent to some positive . Consequently,
An irreducible size- configuration has noncuts. Therefore , and
Set . Expanding (1) gives
Because has no constant term in ,
where
Writing , we obtain for all sufficiently large ,
and therefore
Its leading coefficient is
At , all summands in (3) vanish except . Since ,
Finally, source Proposition 3.5 gives and for . Comparing coefficients in (1),
so
Substituting into (5), the leading coefficient of is exactly for every . This proves both clauses of Conjecture 4.3.
Source: Blitvić and Petrov, Colored interlacing triangles and Genocchi medians, Conjecture 4.3, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04390.